Fb-Button
Allenamento – Pagina 2 – Piero Maina's Website – Never Give Up!

Piero Maina's Website – Never Give Up!

Categoria: Allenamento

Il terzo e il quarto elemento per la riuscita del raggiungimento di un fisico magro e salutare

  • Lesione Del Legamento Crociato Anteriore (LCA) e Operazione Di Ricostruzione: La Mia Esperienza

    Lesione Del Legamento Crociato Anteriore (LCA) e Operazione Di Ricostruzione: La Mia Esperienza

    Titolo: Lesione Del Legamento Crociato Anteriore (LCA) e Operazione Di Ricostruzione: La Mia Esperienza

    Autore: Piero Maina

    Conteggio Parole: 2.934

    Ciao a tutti, è un po’ che non scrivo e di solito negli ultimi tempi ero solito raccontare le novità nel campo del fitness e della forma fisica o della scienza dell’alimentazione o le novità in vista della preparazione a gare di fitness, ma ahimè, il giorn0 11 gennaio 2014 mi sono infortunato malamente sciando e ho riportato la lesione con rottura completa del legamento crociato anteriore (LCA), rottura del menisco mediale, compromissione del legamento crociato posteriore, compromissione del legamento collaterale mediale e frattura del piatto tibiale posteriore nel ginocchio sinistro. Beh, non male! La caduta non è stata rovinosa, nel senso che non ho fatto capriole con gli sci attaccati ai piedi, ho preso un’ “internata” e invece di scivolare via o di rimanere in piedi sullo sci interno, come di solito può accadere, forse a causa del fondo con neve artificiale, gli sci sono partiti verso monte e io mi sono sdraiato sulle code con il sedere attaccato agli scarponi e le ginocchia in alto e ho cercato di contrastare la caduta, anche perché stavo per dare il “giro”, come si dice in gergo e quindi mi aspettavo il peggio. Invece dopo una quarantina di metri fatti con la schiena sulla neve, sono riuscito a recuperare e a tornare in piedi, ma il legamento crociato anteriore non c’era più. Ho terminato la pista 200 mt. sotto sulle mie gambe, ma sentivo oltre al dolore, che qualcosa era successo, mi sentivo come ubriaco e non capivo veramente niente. Era la prima discesa della giornata del primo giorno della settimana bianca che ero andato a fare per allenarmi, ma arrivavo da dieci giorni sciati fino alla settimana precedente ed in formissima fisicamente e atleticamente, oltre ad essere un bravo sciatore con un passato di gare e che ancora si allena sugli sci. E’ vero che gli sci non rispondevano su quel fondo artificiale ed essendo la prima discesa, forse avrei fatto bene a scendere più tranquillo, ma la pista non aveva gobbe o altro, ho padronanza degli sci visto che scio da oltre quarant’anni ed è inutile andare a fare analisi post incidente, doveva succedere, è successo e ora si guarda avanti cercando di recuperare ginocchio e forma al meglio e prima possibile. Tornando al dopo incidente, oltre a pensare che quello che era successo aveva del grottesco, per il modo e la gravità, non volevo pensare al peggio. Ho chiamato un mio amico che avevo appena lasciato in cima alla pista, dicendogli che mi ero fatto male seriamente, ma che ero in piedi e l’avrei raggiunto alla telecabina per scendere a valle e di aspettarmi alla partenza. Nel frattempo ho provato a spingere le tibie sul linguettone degli scarponi e vedevo che stavo in piedi, ma se provavo a fare dei passi, mi sentivo “strano”, ancora non sapevo. Quando ho provato a rimettere gli sci e ho dato pressione sulle talloniere, la gamba sana non ha avuto problemi, mentre quando ho dato pressione con la gamba infortunata, ho avvertito una sensazione spiacevolissima che non scorderò mai più, la tibia è andata da una parte e il femore dall’altra; terribile! Ho chiamato subito il mio amico dicendo che era impossibile raggiungerlo  e da lì sono arrivati quelli del soccorso. La diagnosi è quella che ho scritto sopra e la mia settimana bianca è durata 10 minuti. Settecentocinquanta chilometri di viaggio per mezza pista, e altrettanti per tornare indietro la mattina dopo e grazie al fatto che la gamba infortunata era la sinistra e ho il cambio automatico, sono riuscito a rientrare guidando da solo. Questo il racconto sul come, adesso vediamo cosa è successo una volta rientrato a Roma.

    RMN Villa Stuart
    Clicca sull’immagine per ingrandire

    Ho effettuato la visita ortopedica che naturalmente ha evidenziato alle prove manuali quello che avevo avvertito rimettendo gli sci e che era già stato riscontrato al pronto soccorso di Brunico. Confermato poi dalla RMN con il referto che ho postato sopra e che metto in originale qui a fianco nella foto. Vista la situazione del mio ginocchio, abbiamo rimandato l’operazione di dieci giorni, anche per fare riassorbire in parte l’edema e vedere come rispondeva il ginocchio. Ho indossato un tutore post operatorio Don Joy e ho aspettato la settimana seguente. Visita lunedì 20 gennaio 2014 e operazione confermata per giovedì 23 gennaio 2014. Visto il fatto che sono ancora un atleta in attività, il mio ortopedico che è il Dr. Prof.  Attilio Rota, primario del reparto ortopedia dell’ospedale Sandro Pertini di Roma, mi ha comunicato che pensava di operarmi utilizzando per la ricostruzione dell’LCA, il tendine rotuleo, in funzione della sua esperienza ventennale e che ancora preferiva per atleti che sottopongono a grossi carichi il ginocchio. Ma mi disse anche che in sede di operazione, se non avesse ritenuto le condizioni idonee, avrebbe utilizzato la tecnica di ST (Semitendinoso) + Gracile che oltretutto presenta alcuni pro rispetto al rotuleo. E questo è avvenuto. Non  ha ritenuto ideale la situazione e ha preferito ricostruire utilizzando ST + G. Oltretutto ho i tendini molto grossi e quindi è molto soddisfatto, infatti mi ha detto che ha usato per bucare tibia e femore una punta del 10 e ha poi messo viti dell’11 e mi dice che non capita molto spesso. Mediamente utilizza viti dell’8 e 9 e nei casi maggiori del 10. Ho potuto vedere l’operazione dalla chiavetta USB che mi ha dato e in effetti il ginocchio ha preso una brutta botta e questa è una situazione di partenza più invalidante rispetto a chi arriva con la sola rottura dell’LCA , inoltre sono stato operato anche al menisco mediale.

    Ora vi racconto com’è andata, di modo che possiate trovare informazioni utili:

    Mi sono operato la mattina del 23 gennaio e mi sono presentato in clinica alle 7 e 30 a digiuno, avevo già effettuato gli esami del sangue e l’elettrocardiogramma lunedì 20 e così ho risparmiato tempo. Espletate le operazioni amministrative (mi sono operato in clinica perché assicurato), mi hanno accompagnato in camera, non ho avuto bisogno di depilazione perché avevo già le gambe depilate, ma la prassi per chi ha i peli è di vedersi depilare la gamba. E’ entrato il dottore verso le 8 e 30 e mi ha fatto le solite domande di rito su malattie pregresse, fratture, operazioni, etc. Alle 9 mi hanno portato in sala operatoria e hanno cominciato a farmi l’anestesia, hanno utilizzato l’anestesia locale con tecnica bi-block, addormentandomi la sola gamba, dal piede all’inguine. Sensazione molto strana, perché iniziano dal polpaccio ed è come utilizzare un elettrostimolatore per trovare i nervi. (chi ha già provato, conosce la sensazione) Dolore sopportabile all’inserimento dell’ago, ma si avverte un primo dolore che diminuisce mano, mano. Poi procedono con una puntura dall’inguine, sempre con la stessa procedura delle contrazioni muscolari e poi una nel gluteo e la gamba comincia ad addormentarsi. Mi hanno dato anche un altro sedativo che mi ha mezzo rimbambito e sono entrato in sala operatoria verso le 9 e 20. La gamba era addormentata, ma io sentivo senza dolore apparente (anche se non vedevo niente perché avevo un telo davanti), tutti gli strumenti che mi toccavano il ginocchio e poi le “manovre” che mi venivano praticate che se non avessi avuto la gamba anestetizzata, probabilmente mi avrebbero fatto provare dolori inenarrabili. Alle 9 e 30 è iniziata l’operazione e io potevo vedere il mio ginocchio dal monitor, ma mi sentivo veramente rimbambito dall’anestesia che mi avevano dato oltre alla “locale” nella gamba e “sentivo” il lavoro all’interno. Così hanno deciso di addormentarmi completamente e mi sono perso il resto dell’operazione. Come ho scritto sopra, è stato utilizzato il Semitendinoso e il Gracile quadruplicato e i miei tendini donati sono molto grossi. Avevo chiesto al mio ortopedico Dr. Attilio Rota, cosa ne pensasse della donazione da cadavere, ma lui me l’ha sconsigliato, così come il tendine artificiale LARS. Lui non li utilizza, né lo utilizzano il 90% dei chirurghi al top nel mondo e quindi lui non era e non è disposto ad operare diversamente. E’ uno specialista del ginocchio e compie ricostruzioni del crociato al ritmo di 100/150 crociati all’anno da vent’anni e credo quindi che abbia l’esperienza per parlare. Alle 11 e 40 sono rientrato in camera. Mi sono risvegliato da subito e avevo il tutore bloccato completamente a zero gradi, la gamba era totalmente addormentata e avevo l’antidolorifico che attraverso la flebo faceva il suo dovere. Il contenuto era toradol più morfina ed è durato circa 30 ore. Mi hanno somministrato sempre tramite flebo un antibiotico ogni 12 ore. La prima notte è stata pesantuccia, la gamba ha cominciato a risvegliarsi partendo dal piede poco dopo la mezzanotte e naturalmente dormire non è stato semplice, visto che sono abituato a dormire sul fianco, ma qui era impossibile. Dovevo dormire supino, sulla schiena, ma ogni tanto dovevo spostarmi per far respirare glutei e schiena e in quel caso il ginocchio si faceva sentire. Sentivo sia il peso delle lenzuola sui piedi che il dolore nella parte posteriore della gamba, nella zona dove erano stati prelevati i tendini per la ricostruzione del neo legamento. Dolori presenti, ma sopportabili. Considerate che dalla mattina successiva, la gamba ha cominciato a risvegliarsi sempre più, ma grazie al toradol e morfina, il dolore era sopportabile. Avevo il drenaggio nel ginocchio con un tubicino che usciva dal buco dell’artroscopia  e ho sentito che avevo perso circa 150 ml di sangue la prima notte e andava bene. Nel pomeriggio del giorno successivo all’operazione, ho provato ad alzarmi, con il tutore bloccato e con il drenaggio. Mi sono seduto sul bordo del letto e poi con l’aiuto delle stampelle (canadesi), mi sono alzato in piedi, ho fatto pochi passi nella stanza e poi sono tornato a letto. Qui i protocolli differiscono da medico a medico e da paziente a paziente, più avanti vi racconterò il mio. La seconda notte, anche se l’antidolorifico in vena era terminato e la gamba era più sveglia, ho dormito leggermente meglio. Ho preso il toradol prima di dormire sotto la lingua, mi hanno spruzzato un po’ di liquido con una siringa e pur avendo male nella zona del prelevamento e anche sul ginocchio/tibia, ho dormito discretamente. Sabato mattina 25 gennaio, mi hanno dimesso. E’ venuto il Dr. Attilio Rota in persona a medicarmi e a dimettermi. Mi ha tolto il drenaggio con un po’ di dolore, ma sopportabile e mi ha fatto vedere come usare il Kinetec. Il suo protocollo prevede tre settimane di ginnastica passiva solo con il  kinetec, così da far “raffreddare” il ginocchio dall’operazione e recuperare completamente la mobilità dello stesso e poi dalla quarta settimana cominciare con la fisioterapia attiva, per ulteriori tre settimane (in prima battuta), tre giorni a secco e due giorni in piscina e al termine di queste tre settimane decidere la terapia di conseguenza. Questo protocollo viene utilizzato anche da atleti olimpionici operati da lui. Al momento sono alla seconda settimana di fisioterapia attiva e quindi non ho ancora terminato il periodo. Ma vediamo com’è andata fino ad oggi.

    WP_20140126_11_46_35_Pro
    Clicca sull’immagine per Ingrandire

    Ho cominciato con il kinetec sabato 25 gennaio 2014 appena arrivato a casa e i primi due giorni (sabato e domenica) mi sono limitato a 30°/35° due volte al giorno per 45 minuti. Dal lunedì le sedute sono diventate tre da un’ora ciascuna sono arrivato gradualmente a 60°  giovedì, quindi a una settimana dall’operazione.

    WP_20140130_14_56_26_Pro
    Clicca sull’immagine per Ingrandire

    Ecco il mio ginocchio a una settimana: Ginocchio che a detta dell’ortopedico si presentava molto bene, anche se per me era parecchio gonfio e la gamba che fino a una settimana prima era tonica e abituata ad alzare grossi pesi, veramente piccola, quasi biafrana, la prendevo con due mani. Seconda settimana passata sempre sul kinetec per tre sedute giornaliere da un’ora arrivando da 60° per arrivare a 90° il secondo giovedì. Alla fine di ogni seduta ho sempre messo ghiaccio per circa venti minuti. Non ho fatto elettrostimolazione col Compex che posseggo e che è unaWP_20140204_11_55_33_Pro componente del mio protocollo attuale. Ho rispettato quanto mi ha detto il mio ortopedico, ma ora dove faccio fisioterapia ci sono persone e soprattutto atleti che sono già in palestra a fare fisio attiva e passiva dopo 4 giorni. Sono scelte, ripeto. Ad ogni modo, il secondo giovedì a 14 giorni, mi sono stati levati i punti e sono rimasto con tutore bloccato a 60° e mi è stata tolta una stampella. Infine nella terza settimana, sono arrivato a 120° che è il massimo del Kinetec e ci ero già arrivato il lunedì, quindi in anticipo sui tempi. Ho cominciato a provare a levare completamente le stampelle dentro casa e a caricare sulle scale con passi alternati come se avessi entrambe le ginocchia sane. Visita il mercoledì e conferma di un ginocchio in buone condizioni, con una mobilità ottima per la terza settimana, ma chiaramente ancora molto “duro”. Infatti, bisogna arrivare a piegare si il ginocchio con il kinetec a 120°, ma se uno prova a piegarlo da solo, la cosa deve risultare ancora alquanto difficile. Prima di passare a WP_20140211_12_16_08_Proraccontare la prima settimana di riabilitazione a Villa Stuart a fare fisio attiva, vi racconto le tre settimane passate a casa in termini di dolori e funzionalità. La casa dove abito è su due livelli e quindi ho fatto trasportare un letto al piano terra per le prime due settimane, ma considerate che le scale le salivo con le stampelle già dal quarto giorno post operatorio. Onde evitare possibili incidenti ho preferito rimanere al pianterreno e di non andare quasi mai al piano superiore, ma sappiate che nel caso non riusciste ad organizzarvi, ce la potete fare. Per rientrare a casa ho dovuto viaggiare disteso per lungo sul sedile posteriore e le buche si sentivano un po’ nella zona del prelevamento, ma niente di trascendentale. La prima notte a casa che era la terza dopo l’operazione, ero senza l’antidolorifico in vena e ho preso il bufren per bocca tre volte al giorno, per poi scendere a due dal lunedì, una a pranzo e una a cena prima di dormire e vi assicuro che i dolori sono rimasti sotto controllo. Semmai i dolori sono aumentati nella zona della tibia a destra e a sinistra della cicatrice che è rimasta insensibile fino a questi giorni che sono 30 dopo l’operazione. E poi abbastanza dolore sotto la rotula. Ho avuto male a più riprese per tutto questo mese, ma sempre di meno e ad ondate. Dal quinto giorno si dorme decisamente meglio e dalla seconda settimana è tutto in discesa. La doccia non l’ho più fatta fino al lunedì della terza settimana, quindi in diciottesima giornata. Questo è già un lato molto positivo e poi le gambe, per quanto piccole e instabili, cominciano anche se a fatica a risopportare il peso ed ho ricominciato a salire le scale a passo alternato in ventesima giornata e anche a guidare col cambio automatico. Infatti anche se fossi passeggero, una volta che la gamba può essere distesa, farebbe esattamente lo stesso e non devo né frenare, né usare la frizione. C’è da dire che arrivavo da una situazione fisica di iper allenamento e quindi nonostante la mia età , non posso confrontarmi con pazienti che sono in sovrappeso o svolgono una vita sedentaria. Come ho scritto sopra, ogni paziente risponde a modo suo, sappiate che dal primo giorno che sono tornato a casa, le gambe le ho lasciate stare, ma tutto il resto ho ripreso ad allenarlo con i dovuti tempi e modi. Certo facevo e faccio una gran fatica per via dell’indebolimento e il fiato che non c’è più e poi la fatica per proteggere le aree infortunate, ma grazie ad esempio alla mia area addominale e del “core”, riesco a deambulare e a compiere gli esercizi isometrici con estrema facilità e che sicuramente non riuscirei a fare se arrivassi da una situazione pregressa di non allenamento e di sovrappeso. Per quanto riguarda i medicinali, ho preso l’antibiotico per via intramuscolare per cinque giorni due volte al giorno, abbastanza doloroso, poi il gastroprotettore per via orale per dieci giorni, l’antidolorifico fino a quando sopportavo i dolori; io l’ho sospeso in decima giornata e poi la puntura nella pancia di Clexane, 4.000 U.I.  per i trombi per venti giorni, una volta al giorno la sera e la calza a compressione anti trombosi che ho indossato per 20 giorni.  Ho fatto Kinetec fino a domenica 16 Febbraio 2014 e poi lunedì ho iniziato il protocollo attivo che perdura anche adesso fino a tutta la prossima settimana. Il protocollo prevede Lun/Mer/Ven in palestra a secco con esercizi di isometria e questa settimana che sono a 30 giorni dall’intervento ho aggiunto camminata sul tapis roulant e cyclette, più elettrostimolazione che faccio anche a casa. A casa poi continuo con il P90X ridotto e trazioni alla sbarra con gambe in isometria. Il Mar/Gio, invece sono in piscina, dove svolgo esercizi di mobilità e rafforzamento, con la riduzione della gravità grazie alla presenza dell’acqua. E questo è un ottimo aiuto per ricominciare gradualmente. Ricordate che ora stiamo guarendo e stiamo ripartendo, non possiamo considerarci atleti sani e quindi i muscoli vanno trattati diversamente da un muscolo sano, allenato e ipertrofico come ero abituato ad avere. Ed infatti proprio ieri ho avuto una contrattura all’ischiocrurale che spero si risolva nei prossimi giorni come tale e che non sia una lesione perché questo comporterebbe tempi più lunghi. “Quality over quantity” .

    Bene, continuerò a tenervi aggiornati fino a completa guarigione, sperando di farvi cosa gradita e spero che possiate trovare spunto se siete in una situazione analoga. Se avete domande, scrivetemi pure e il proseguo lo farò in articoli nuovi,(qui) anche per avere una lettura più agevole, visto che qui siamo già a quasi 3.000 parole. Naturalmente metterò il link così che possiate ritrovare questo articolo, sempre nelle categorie “Tenersi in Forma” e  “infortuni”.

    Stay Tuned!

    © Copyright Piero Maina – All Rights Reserved

  • The Sad Truth About New Years resolutions

    The Sad Truth About New Years resolutions

    Title: The Sad Truth About New Years resolutions
    By line: By Tom Venuto, CSCS, NSCA-CPT
    URL: www.BurnTheFat.com
    Word count: 755 words

     

    Jim Rohn once said, “I find it fascinating that most
    people plan their vacations with better care than they
    plan their lives. Perhaps it’s because escape is
    easier than change.”

    If the statistics from motivation experts and success
    psychologists are correct (95% of the people in the world do NOT have written goals and fail, while 5% have
    written goals and succeed), then Mr Rohn’s observation
    really IS quite fascinating isn’t it?

    If clear, scientifically-written goals are the key to
    success, then why wouldn’t more people make the time
    and effort to set goals? Beats me. Mystery of life.

    Unfortunately for most people, the odds for success
    are actually even lower, because out of the few people who
    do set goals, most don’t take goal setting seriously and
    they don’t do it scientifically.

    At the beginning of every year, you see countless articles
    about getting fit, losing fat, and nearly everyone talks
    about “new years resolutions.”

    And that’s the problem – you may think you are setting
    real goals, but if you’re like most people, you’re probably
    only making flimsy, wishy-washy, powerless “resolutions.”

    Zig Ziglar once said that, “A goal casually set and lightly
    taken will be freely abandonded at the first obstacle.”

    You might want to go back and read that quote again,
    maybe even write it down or print it out, because that
    one hits the bullseye!

    This truly explains why new years resolutions almost never
    work, and why so few people can keep off the pounds after
    they get rid of them.

    Goal setting should not be casual or lightly taken. Goal
    setting is an important and serious matter. This is not a
    game – this is your life, and you only have one life to live.

    Goal setting is so important, that I always teach goal
    setting and mind dynamics first, and only THEN, do I teach
    nutrition and training second.

    In fact, I devoted the entire first chapter of my book,
    Burn the Fat, Feed the Muscle (BFFM) to this subject of
    goals and constructive “mind programming” for success

    I don’t care how much you know about nutrition or exercise,
    until specialized knowledge is linked with purpose, vision
    and goals, the knowledge is useless and there can be no
    intelligent accomplishment.

    If you want to learn more about the real proven science
    of achieving goals and getting the body you want, then
    going to www.BurnTheFat.com and getting the Burn The Fat,
    Feed The Muscle ebook may be the most important investmen’t
    you make this entire year…

    Why? Because you won’t just learn what fat burning foods to
    eat or how to exercise for burning fat, you will also learn
    how to set goals scientifically and how to harness the awesome
    power of your mind to help you acheive your goals and to put
    yourself in that elite group of the 5% who succeed.

    As you start thinking about your goals for 2014 right Now,
    I’d like to help you start the year off right by sharing
    one very valuable and powerful tip:

    *** Set realistic goals, without limits ***

    I know that may sound contradictory. How can you set a
    goal that is realistic and also has no limits?

    Let me explain

    As a fat loss coach, I sometimes have a dilemma…

    One one hand, I want my clients and proteges to set goals
    which are achievable and realistic. But on the other hand,
    I hate to set limits on what someone can or cannot achieve.

    I like to say that If youre going to question anything,
    question your limits.

    Here’s what I suggest to do when you set your goals
    for 2014:

    Set goals that are specific, measureable, ambitious, and
    have a realistic time frame (deadline). But don’t stop there…

    This year, turn your goals into NO LIMIT goals!

    As the subconscious mind tends to take you literally and
    at your own estimation, why put a definite cap on your goal
    by stopping with a goal statement like, “I am losing 6% body
    fat by April 15th?”
    Why not say, “I am losing 6% body fat OR MORE by April 15th,” or,
    “I am gaining AT LEAST 12 pound of lean muscle in the next
    three months.”

    When you say, “I will achieve X OR BETTER,” you can have a
    realistic goal, but one without limits.

    Make the time to set your goals, today! Take it seriously
    and set your goals without limits.

    Do it and this could be the best year of your life.

    Train hard and expect success,

    Tom Venuto, NSCA-CPT, Tom Venuto 8CSCS

    Fat Loss Coach

    http://www.BurnTheFat.com

  • Burn The Fat Summer Challenge 2012: How I Have Succeed And Got “Most Ripped Man Over 50” Award. My Interview

    Burn The Fat Summer Challenge 2012: How I Have Succeed And Got “Most Ripped Man Over 50” Award. My Interview

    Title: Burn The Fat SummerChallenge 2012: How I Have Succeed And Got “Most Ripped Man Over 50” Award. My Interview

    By: Piero Maina

    Word Count: 3.770

    Here below you can read my interview released to Tom Venuto at Burn The Fat Inner Circle after my body transformation during the Burn The Fat Summer Challenge 2012. You also find my whole story and what I had to overcome to suceed. I hope my story will inspire some of you in order to take action toward a better body and a better health. Have a nice reading.

    The Real Life Italian Stallion: Piero’s Journey to Become the Most Ripped Man Over 50

    By Tom Venuto
    Printer-Friendly Format

    To reach a ripped body fat level of 4.9% is a remarkable achievement for a man of any age. Piero Maina of Rome, Italy did it at age 50. Even more remarkable is what he had to overcome to achieve this…

    For years, Piero has suffered from deep vein thrombosis (Paget-Schroetter Syndrome), which at times prevented him from lifting his arm over his head.

    During all of the Burn the Fat Challenge contests he entered, Piero also had a tibia stress fracture, two broken ribs, sprained ankles, Morton’s Neuroma in both feet, and tennis elbow in both elbows and yet he never let it stop him.

    If you want to learn the attitudes and strategies it takes not only to get very lean, but to overcome obstacles and become a champion, then this is the must-read interview of the year…

    ###

     

    Tom: Piero, congratulations on your great results during the Burn the Fat challenge. We previously had categories for the most ripped and the most transformed over age 50. You were a contender for both of those awards and since the competition was so tight and we didn’t have runners up listed, we created a new award to acknowledge your achievement – the most ripped man over 50. We’re looking forward to hearing about your training and nutrition strategies, but first, could you tell us a little bit about yourself, where you’re from and what made you decide to do the Burn the Fat challenge.

    Piero: Tom, first let me thank you for giving me the opportunity to share my experience in the Burn The Fat Challenge with everyone. It has been a phenomenal journey this year, but it wasn’t the first time. This was my third challenge.

    Introducing myself, I am an Italian young man of nearly 51 years who lives in Rome – one of the most beautiful cities in the world. And of course, Italy is also known for the delicious food, particularly in this area. We could even say that in Italy, food is one of the main attractions. By the way, the Venuto surname sounds familiar to me, are your parents natives from Italy?

    I’ve lived here with my wife since 1985 and we have two boys of 14 and 8. I’ve been an athlete all my life, playing several sports, but got my best results as a competitor in skiing, windsurfing, running, swimming and now I’m committed to golf. Obviously, I still train with weights and do cardio nearly every day (running, biking and swimming in summer time).

    I decided to participate in the Summer Challenge for the first time three years ago, during my stay in Milan (600 km from Rome). The company where I worked for 26 years moved me there, putting huge stress on me, and then three days before the 2010 Challenge, my mom passed away. It wasn’t the best time to start, but I entered The Burn The Fat Summer Challenge anyway.

    Tom: Thank you for the background, Piero and yes, my grandfather’s parents on my dad’s side came over from Aliano in Southern Italy, so I have the surname and there’s some Italian blood in me… So we’ve seen that you entered the challenge before and despite your hardships, you had very good results. But this time you took it to an all new level. Could you tell us about your results from this last Burn the Fat challenge – your change in body fat and lean mass. And what did you do to get in your best shape ever this time – did you fine tune your approach, train harder, diet stricter or do anything different?

    Piero: It was a mix of everything you mentioned. I was also more dedicated and had a stronger desire to succeed. I purchased Burn the Fat, Feed the Muscle (BFFM) in 2005, but due to physical problems and limiting beliefs, I never started. I told myself that everything I needed to know for losing fat was right there in the Burn the Fat, Feed the Muscle fat loss “bible,” but I still procrastinated. At the time, I was unaware that I was only making excuses.

    Finally, in the months leading up to May 2010 (before my first challenge) I read BFFM again and made the decision to start and see where I would land. Even though I had to live in a hotel and ate only in the restaurant or even in my car, that summer I reached 8.5% bodyfat starting from 16%. Last year in the same situation, but with one year more of experience, I reached 5.4% bodyfat starting from 12%, with two broken ribs and a sprained ankle. I started leaner and ended leaner, but there was so much competition, even last year I wasn’t in the top 10.

    This year I finally made an agreement with my old company and I returned home. So performing in a better environment and mood, I hit 4.9% bodyfat during the summer challenge and I won the most ripped man over 50 special award. Returning home it has been surely a better situation, but even that wasn’t perfect, since I traveled with my family from mid July to the end of August, where we stayed in a village eating at buffets. Obviously on holiday you have more free time and your mind is more relaxed, so in theory, it should be easier to succeed, but again in my case this wasn’t exactly true. My wife asked me why I was on holiday, but not “enjoying” the vacation (the food!) Every evening for dinner you can’t imagine what kind of God’s bounties were on the table!

    This year I wanted to succeed, like last year, but this year, I was totally focused on my goal. With my starting situation, I obviously aimed to win the “Best transformation over age 50”, and I did my best to get that goal. I always ate clean food, six times per day, and it wasn’t the easiest task during my travels, to organize everything, in order to avoid to missing meals. I made it easier by carrying with me my whey protein, Quaker oats or meal replacements and almonds or other snacks, so I didn’t have to cook or find a restaurant.

    In the first month, I did cardio three to four times per week and that brought my body fat down at the right pace. Once I was on vacation in the middle of July, I started to push myself beyond the normal limits I was used to. Every morning I woke up and ran for an hour and a later in the day did a half an hour of swimming.

    In the afternoon in the hot summer, I hit the gym in the village for my daily weights workout. Keep in mind that except for the 15 days I spent in the village, I never trained in a gym. I worked out using dumbbells at home and using elastic bands when I was traveling, and I did a lot of push ups and pull ups. The pull ups (and other types of weight training) can be dangerous due to my personal health issues, so I did them when I could, but more often trained back by doing elastic band rows anchored in the door.

    My workouts were a mix of free weights, floor exercises, calisthenics and cardio. When I didn’t have a gym, I didn’t let that stop me, and I simply paid maniacal attention to my food.

    Tom: Tell us about your food strategy. How many calories, how did you split up the protein, carbs, and fats and what foods did you eat? Also, since you are from Italy, we were wondering if you ate anything different than we typically eat here in the states and whether you found the nutrition side of things harder, easier or not a factor based on where you’re from and what food was available.

    Piero: I knew that in order to succeed, things must be done as best as you can with what you have and you can’t leave things to chance. So I’m used to weighing my food nearly all the time. Obviously I don’t do that when I eat out at restaurants or at certain times of the year. But when you’re competing for you’re absolute best in a challenge competition, I was able to do it almost all the time, so I did.

    I wake up at 6:30 and usually take 30 g of whey protein with 300 ml of water and a sweet potato. Sometime I also have a raw peach or a kiwi. The second meal, which I consider my “real breakfast,” is oatmeal with a banana mixed in and 6 egg whites with one whole egg scrambled or hard boiled. I eat plenty of fish, shellfish, chicken and turkey breast, eggs, sometimes dairy, lean red lean meat, plenty of vegetables, fruit, brown rice and a lot of sweet potatoes. The meals during the rest of the day are usually the same, but I try to eat less carbs in the afternoon/evening.

    My total calories vary a lot between 1,800 to as high as 3,800, depending on whether I worked out or if it’s a refeed day (I’m not afraid to eat a lot more carbs on a reefed days). My carbs have ranged anywhere from 140 g to 550 g, my protein 160 g to 280 g, and fat from 45 g to 90 g At the beginning of the challenge in June, I weighted 80kg/176 lbs and at the end in September I was 72 kg/ 159 Lbs. So when it’s time to reduce carbs, I eat about 1 g per lb of weight and when it’s a re-feed day, all the way up to 3 g per lb.

    About food in Italy, I assume you know that here we have an ancient tradition for food and food specialties. Usually tourists come to Italy not just for the beauty, but also for food, and surely we have different habits relative to other countries. For example, until I started with BFFM, I never ate oatmeal, but I learned from you that this was one of the important foods in the bodybuilder world, so I found Quaker oats from the web and now after three years I’ve had it nearly every day. I have to admit, the very first time it was a hard task to eat (plain). But now, with a banana or other fruit mixed it, it is my best friend as a breakfast meal.

    We cook foods in different ways here, but fish is fish here, and the same goes for chicken breast and green veggies like broccoli (maybe they are different in quality). I also make sure to take the right amount of macronutrients, which means I eat the right amount of each food to reach my goals. I eat for more than just taste now, but believe me, I like and appreciate well cooked, good tasting food.

    The hardest part in my summer challenge was my family. They do not follow me or support me in any way and here sweets, chocolate, pastries, chips and other junky foods are the norm. They eat in front of me and even try to tease or tempt me, but my mind was strong, so I never touched anything that was off my plan during the Burn the Fat Challenge (except at the conclusion!)

    On Monday, September 10th, after taking my final pictures, I continued to feed myself on my usual meal plan with lean proteins, the right carbs and so on, but at lunch I decided to celebrate my son’s birthday by eating one big slice of cake and 7 small pastries. After dinner that night, I joined them again for celebrating and guess what? I ate two more slices of cake and even more pastries! I know for sure that I ate thousands of extra calories that day.

    I thought I wouldn’t sleep that night, but instead, I slept perfectly and the next day, I went early in the morning for a 30 km bike ride and was right back to the usual plan. The interesting part is that super high carb re-feed day actually seemed to be good for me, as I didn’t take on one visible ounce of fat. So I learned an important lesson – that after I am already very lean, if I want to take one extremely high carb day – even from junk food – I can do it without much (or any) damage to my results. The key, I believe, is to keep it to just every once in a while.

    Tom: At the Burn the Fat Inner Circle, we talk a lot about mental strategies, because staying motivated and sticking with your nutrition and training plan is really the key to success and achieving any major goal. What was your approach toward staying motivated and sticking with your plan?

    Piero: When I came across Burn the Fat, Feed the Muscle in 2005, I read the first chapter that teaches us to lay down our goals and read them as much as we can, believing and visualizing what we wrote, and at first it made me think, “What kind of a way to act is that?” Yes, I read the part about conscious and unconscious mind and how behaviors are unconsciously influenced, but I thought that if I knew what I wanted, there wasn’t any need to write down and repeat what already I knew.

    Well, I put one of my goals on paper, not for my physique, but an achievement for golf, and I failed. I realize now I didn’t believe in it, so I think I failed to prove to myself, “See, it doesn’t work – it’s B.S.!” Years later, I not only adopted and believed in goal setting, I started studying everything about the mental side of achievement. I read a lot of books ranging from quantum physics, law of attraction, Buddhism, NLP, PSYCH-K® and landed on “A Course in Miracles.” My way of seeing things changed dramatically and forever, and by 2010, I returned to BFFM and started to apply what you taught us and everything else I had learned, with a new faith.

    I can’t say if you “just” think positive, everything you think in your mind will happen at once. What really happens is you set a goal to get from point A to point B as quickly as possible, but more often than not, you’ll deviate from the original route and hit a certain quantity of obstacles that you didn’t foresee or plan for. That happened even to me.

    The difference between when I succeeded and when I failed, is that I continued to think as positively as possible, without moving my sights from my goal, regardless of what I encountered along the way that I didn’t expect. I kept the faith in my goal alive, I kept reading my goal card twice per day and I took on adversities as opportunities to get stronger and keep going until I hit my target! I believe there is no failing, only results, and every result I get, even if I didn’t intend it, can be used to build up a better strategy to succeed in the future.

    I had to do this mainly by myself, and I could because I have a tough and disciplined mind, but it’s people like you Tom, and other mentors that helped me through their books, articles and words that I re-read many times. This summer, I re-read BFFM three times, and also the holy grail e-book, and your Super Lean report. I often come into the burn the fat inner circle forum, looking for success stories that could motivate me and for people who succeeded even with tougher life situations than mine. I did this because I would say the mental side is the most important key to success.

    Tom: We understand that you had some major physical challenges to overcome and yet you still made an incredible transformation. Could you tell us more about how they affected you?

    Piero: I’ve had many beautiful things happen in my life, but I’ve also had a lot of accidents. I had 5 near-fatal accidents with my motorbike and cars, several ruptures of my head and other part of my body. In these three last summer challenges I also had in order, a tibia stress fracture, two broken ribs, sprained ankles, Morton’s Neuroma in both feet, tennis elbow in both elbows and more, but I didn’t let it stop me. In 1994, I had my first deep-vein thrombosis or Paget Schroetter Syndrome. I have to go back a bit to tell the story.

    When I was in my physical prime at age 20, I was very passionate for bodybuilding. At that time, Arnold was at his best and I followed him in bodybuilding magazines, but my favorite was Frank Zane – that body was my target! I loved his symmetry and proportion rather than huge mass. Unfortunately, I couldn’t get much information at the time and my father didn’t want me training as a bodybuilder. So I played my favorite sports instead.

    Later when I was 30, I started to train myself in the gym as a bodybuilder, still without much information, and right when I was at my best, I had a very serious accident during a training session. While doing presses, (we called it here, “lento dietro”), and due to my skeletal conformation in the shoulder area, I had a deep-vein thrombosis. I had it twice (two years in a row) in my left arm. Two veins were injured, the subclavian vein and axillary vein.

    Doctors told me to stop every kind of training that involved my arms. I took anti-coagulation pills (warfarin) for years and I remained invalid in my left arm, but now I’ve restored a peripheral flow of blood in the minor veins and I would say I am nearly back to where I was in my prime.

    The doctors still say I shouldn’t train with weights, and above all, to avoid lifting my arms overhead for shoulder, chest and back training, but during these last three years, lot of things have changed. I found problems in my teeth that I could solve surgically and oddly enough, those were the main causes of my skeletal problems. For example, I met a doctor who used innovative orthodontic techniques that not only changed my teeth, but also my posture in my neck, shoulders and upper back without any other surgical intervention.

    So, even with my veins damaged and semi-closed, I restarted training myself with weights and with my new positive mental view, results came quickly and I reached my best body shape ever thanks to Tom’s program and challenge.

    Tom: What’s your advice to give more hope and optimism to anyone else who is struggling with an illness or an orthopedic problem that has made it challenging for them to get leaner or fitter in the past?

    Piero: Whatever your situation, always do your best and have no regrets! Maybe to you, what you can do doesn’t seem like enough, but try to move one step at a time toward your goal, even if it’s a small step or less than you would like to do. Obviously, when my body says stop, I have to stop – I can’t work miracles. At one point, it was impossible to lift even a bottle of water. But I never lost my faith in what I want to be or where I want to be.

    I’ve trained with pain, but I’ve learned that at the first signal of real injury, it’s better to stop. It’s better to be under-trained 10% that over- trained 1% if that 1% extra push gets you injured. It’s better to skip a workout to play it safe than skip a month to nurse your injury. Try to feel the signals from your body, including the feelings in your heart, if you’re not sure.

    Also remember how much you can achieve when you’re super strict with nutrition. When I felt pain I couldn’t train through, I didn’t give up and say, “I should just withdraw from the summer challenge and enjoy my vacation.” On the contrary, I pushed harder in all the areas where I still could – cardio or weight training – and I made my diet even stricter, without cheating. I especially tightened up the carb manipulations until I saw the results coming.

    I have to admit, it has been difficult and frustrating to feel like you’re always working around something, but in the end, I got what you see in my pictures.

    Tom: Before we wrap up, do you have any other advice for our readers on making a great body transformation or anything else at all you want to share?

    Piero: Of course I have more, but I nearly wrote a book here, LOL, so I’ll quickly wrap up! Furthermore, I’m still learning myself every day, I continue having new experiences and discovering how my body responds. This, I think, is the difference: I don’t just say empty words or affirmations – I act exactly as I think and talk. I focus on both – thoughts and actions – so more often than not, I reach the goals I was thinking and talking about. It’s not easy for me, but now that I have this lifestyle ingrained in my unconscious mind, everything I do I feel as normal (though, from some other people’s viewpoints, I’m still often seen as an “alien!”)

    I can simply say to all the members here to study Burn the Fat, Feed the Muscle (BFFM) as much as you can, learn it and ingrain it in your mind. In that book, there is only truth, no fancy words or quick fixes. In the toughest days during the Summer Challenge, I would always repeat to myself what Tom wrote about wanting your goal. There may be blood, sweat and tears, but “Train hard and expect success!”

    Thank you Tom, for helping me and so many other people to change our lives for the better.

     

    Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape
    All text and photographs copyright Burn The Fat Inner Circle. No reproduction permitted.
     © Copyright Piero Maina – All Rights Reserved

  • Burn The Fat Summer Challenge 2013….Ancora in gioco….

    Burn The Fat Summer Challenge 2013….Ancora in gioco….

    Titolo: Burn The Fat Summer Challenge 2013….Ancora in gioco….

    Autore: Piero Maina

    Conteggio Parole: 3.000

    Ciao a tutti,

    anche quest’anno ho deciso di prendere parte alla Burn The Fat Summer Challenge, la sfida di trasformazione corporea/dimagrimento della durata di 98 giorni/14 settimane. Per me si tratta del quarto anno consecutivo e sono riuscito a terminare con successo tutte e tre le passate edizioni. L’anno scorso non solo ho raggiunto e superato l’obiettivo che mi ero prefissato, (6% di massa grassa) ma ho anche ricevuto il premio come il più definito nella categoria oltre i 50 anni (Most Ripped Man Over 50). Non racconto nuovamente il tutto perché l’argomento è stato ampiamente trattato nell’articolo riguardante la Summer Challenge del 2012 e chi è interessato può leggere la mia esperienza cliccando qui.

    Avevo già in programma di partecipare alla gara di quest’anno e il mio progetto era di incrementare la mia massa muscolare/massa magra durante l’inverno. Provenivo dalla fine della scorsa summer challenge a Settembre 2012 con una percentuale di massa grassa corporea pari al 4,9% e devo dire che senza troppa fatica fino alla fine di gennaio avevo mantenuto un risultato intorno al 7 % pur avendo “gozzovigliato” durante le festività Natalizie e non rinunciando anche a incursioni su qualche dolce. Non crediate che nel programma di Burn the Fat FeedThe Muscle ci siano cibi vietati, si può mangiare di tutto, naturalmente stando attenti alle quantità; nel periodo di gara invece, meno “sgarri” si fanno e maggiori saranno le probabilità di successo. Da settembre 2012 in avanti, avevo continuato gli allenamenti e fino a dicembre la mia alimentazione è sempre stata “pulita” senza sbandate e utilizzando la tecnica di manipolazione dei carboidrati con un rapporto di 1:3. Un giorno di surplus e tre di scarico, non totale, circa 2 grammi per kg di peso corporeo. Da Gennaio a Marzo ero cresciuto un poco di massa grassa, ma ero sempre “tirato” e avevo in programma di “lievitare” fino all’inizio della Burn The Fat Summer Challenge 2013. Per chi ha letto l’articolo sulla Summer Challenge 2012, è inutile spiegare che lo scopo è di perdere grasso e non peso, oppure anche peso se manterremo la nostra attuale massa muscolare. Il tentativo comunque è di non sacrificare nemmeno un etto di muscolo, ma di perdere solo grasso a differenza delle normali diete che invece si preoccupano del peso sulla bilancia. L’altra differenza nella Summer Challenge è che si verrà premiati in base alla trasformazione corporea rispetto a se stessi, più che rispetto agli altri o a un eventuale modello. Ognuno deve provare a dare il meglio di se e trasformarsi rispetto alla stato iniziale. Anche in questo caso è superfluo che racconti nuovamente come funziona lo stile di vita di Burn The Fat Feed The Muscle perché c’è l’articolo che lo spiega qui.

    Sopra ho raccontato come è proceduto il mio stato di forma, ma non ho detto che già prima dell’inizio della Summer Challenge 2012 ero affetto da una forte epicondilite al gomito destro e da un’ inizio di epitrocleite a quello sinistro. Sono golfista e questa è una patologia a cui si va soggetti, così come i tennisti. Mi ero fatto un’infiltrazione di cortisone al gomito destro nel mese di gennaio 2012 e il sinistro l’avevo risparmiato, visto che riuscivo a convivere con il dolore, ma a giugno, proprio all’inizio della Summer Challenge il dolore al gomito destro era tornato molto forte e se volevo continuare ad allenarmi dovevo effettuare un’altra infiltrazione di cortisone. Cosa che ho fatto, ma l’effetto benefico è durato un solo mese e sapevo che non potevo ripeterne un’altra, il cortisone si sa, fa più male che bene. Ho incontrato un medico che mi ha infiltrato con l’ozono e il miglioramento temporaneo c’è stato, ma non sono riuscito a dare continuità alla cura e il dolore non solo è tornato a destra, ma e venuto anche a sinistra e pure l’epitrocleite a sinistra è aumentata con forza. Sono riuscito a concludere la scorsa Summer Challenge stringendo i denti e le foto le avete viste nell’articolo riferito al 2012 qui. La mia speranza era che durante l’autunno/inverno, la malattia ai gomiti piano, piano sarebbe passata, ma invece di regredire è aumentata. Il problema non è solo il golf, ma l’allenamento con i manubri e le trazioni alla sbarra. I pesanti manubri in certe posizioni sono delle pugnalate per le guaine tendinee/inserzioni ossee e quindi all’inizio del 2013 ho dovuto accettare di ridurre gli allenamenti per le braccia, spalle e dorsali fino a quasi fermarmi completamente. Avendo effettuato una ecografia ad entrambi i gomiti, ho potuto vedere perché il cortisone non riusciva a fornire risultati duraturi: avevo le calcificazioni nelle guaine dei tendini. A quel punto le soluzioni sono due, (che io conosco)  la via chirurgica, (che sinceramente avrei evitato volentieri) o le onde d’urto (e anche qui ce ne sono di vari tipi). Naturalmente ho preferito le onde d’urto e ho fatto una prima seduta a Febbraio 2013 con una macchina elletroidraulica , molto potente a Trento, un vero martello che ogni volta che “picchiava” sulla parte dolorante provocava un dolore terribile, mi si stendevano le dita delle mani e ho dovuto stringere i denti e trovare concentrazione per resistere al dolore. Oltretutto a quei tempi ero davvero infiammato. Comunque ho fatto 1800 colpi in un’ unica seduta, seicento colpi per gomito per l’epicondilite, più altri seicento all’interno del gomito sinistro per l’epitrocleite. Il primo risultato è stato che avevo ancora più male, poi il dolore è diminuito un poco, ma sempre impossibile allenarsi. Ho effettuato una seconda seduta a Roma con una macchina elettromagnetica e mi sembrava ridicola rispetto a quella di Trento, mi sembrava che sui gomiti mi venisse passata una di quelle macchinette per accendere il gas e non ho sentito quasi dolore. Il dolore nei gomiti però è rimasto tale e quale. Ho ripetuto a metà Marzo un’altra seduta a Trento e il dolore era ancora forte, ma nei giorni seguenti l’ho sentito meno “radiale” e più circoscritto. Allenamenti ancora niente, anche perché proprio il giorno prima di scendere a Trento dall’Alto Adige, in una caduta banale sugli sci ho riportato la lesione parziale del legamento crociato anteriore sinistro (LCA) e la lesione del menisco mediale sempre sinistro, oltre a due fratture intraspongiose del piatto tibiale e alla lesione degli osteocondriti femorali. Tombola! Rispetto alle prime visite in Alto Adige, a Roma pur avendo avuto la conferma di quanto sopra, le prove manuali hanno mostrato un ginocchio stabile, forse dovute alla mia muscolatura allenata (ho sciato tutto l’inverno e ho fatto molte uscite in mountain bike) . Comunque non abbiamo operato il legamento e per il menisco stiamo ancora decidendo. Ad oggi che scrivo ho dolore alla parte mediale sinistra, non un vero e proprio dolore, è un dolore sordo e il mio ortopedico mi ha detto che potrebbe ancora operarmi al menisco, che tra l’altro ha già operato nel 2001. Pertanto oltre allo stare fermo con gli allenamenti con i manubri da metà marzo a metà aprile, ho dovuto fermarmi con tutto il resto per via del ginocchio. Poi con il consenso del mio ortopedico ho ricominciato con la MTB,(mountain bike) ma dopo 3 uscite sono caduto e mi sono rotto il pollice della mano destra. Una caporetto! Anche con il pollice rotto dopo una settimana ho ripreso gli allenamenti in MTB, difficile utilizzare il cambio, ma con un tutore e un po’ di buona volontà, sono riuscito a progredire. E i gomiti? Ho fatto una quarta seduta nel mese di aprile e questa volta pur avendo ancora male, soprattutto quando utilizzavo i flessori delle mani, le “martellate” della macchina delle onde d’urto non mi facevano più male, era come colpire una qualunque parte del corpo sana e il dolore era oramai circoscritto a piccole aree. Ed infatti ho male ancora oggi, ma sempre meno e sento che sono in via di guarigione, Considerate poi che dal 10 giugno, giorno in cui è partita la Summer Challenge, ho ripreso gli allenamenti con i manubri e le richieste di sforzo stanno aumentando quotidianamente. Avendo ancora dolore per certi esercizi, la paura era che sarebbe peggiorato tutto, invece  sta andando molto meglio e non so in quanto tempo ancora, ma dovrei guarire completamente. Almeno adesso è un dolore sopportabile e sto anche giocando a golf senza sentire dolori impossibili.

    Ecco spiegato perché il mio progetto di aumentare di massa (grassa e magra) è naufragato. Avrei dovuto mangiare molto e in un certo modo, ma avrei anche dovuto allenarmi in maniera ambiziosa e questo non è stato possibile per i fatti raccontati sopra. Fino a Marzo comunque ero ben allenato, un po’ meno nelle braccia e ora sto tornando piano, piano ai miei livelli con un grande incremento come attività cardio che effettuo 6 giorni a settimana su 7. Alterno MTB alla corsa e al nuoto, oltre all’allenamento contro resistenza che come sapete è il P90X Hybrid.

    Non posto le foto iniziali che sono state postate nel forum di gara per scaramanzia, ma le posterò a fine gara dopo il 16 Settembre 2016, sto cercando di mantenere il peso a tutti i costi, ma va da se che senza steroidi in tre mesi, non potrò fare molto e quindi dovendo arrivare al 4% di massa grassa scenderò per forza, ma è certo che con la giusta alimentazione e i giusti allenamenti, non diminuirò la quantità di muscolo che ho adesso.

    Per chi è interessato ai dati, ho iniziato la Summer Challenge il 10 giugno con un peso totale di 83 Kg. per un’altezza di 178 cm. e la massa grassa che è lievitata al 17,5%. Progetto ambizioso in 98 giorni è di arrivare al 4%. Oggi è il 7  luglio e sono già all’11%. avendo perso 7 cm. di giro vita e il peso totale è ancora a 78 Kg. in meno di un mese. Presumo che arriverò intorno ai 72 kg. di peso totale e tra i 70/72 cm di giro vita, per settembre, mentre avrei voluto essere 78 Kg. con il 4% di massa grassa nello stesso periodo. Perché questo avvenisse avrei dovuto operare in un certo modo durante l’inverno, ma va bene così. Ricordo sempre che sono principalmente un’atleta e non solo un bodybuilder (sono atleti anche loro per carità), ma voglio dire che preferisco riuscire bene in altre discipline sportive e non avere solo massa muscolare da mostrare, magari costruita con steroidi.

    Aggiornamento al 31/07/2013:

    Siamo alla settima settimana di gara e quindi siamo a metà percorso. I gomiti sembrano andare meglio e questo è un gran bene per la riuscita degli allenamenti, il ginocchio sinistro sembra essere stabile e ogni tanto si fa sentire con qualche dolorino “sordo”, ma al momento riesco sia a correre che ad andare in MTB, evito i balzi e quindi tutta la parte del “Plyometric”. Anche i piedi con il neuroma di Morton mi stanno lasciando respirare e nonostante un piede sano da sensazioni nettamente differenti da quelle che provo io, già non avere fitte costanti è per me un risultato di successo. A parte infortuni e salute, mi sto allenando duramente soprattutto come attività cardio e sono a 6 sedute settimanali con giornate in cui effettuo doppio cardio oltre all’allenamento contro resistenza che per me è il P90X-P90X2-Hybrid. La parte più importante, anche se sinergica con l’allenamento e l’aspetto mentale, la gioca sempre l’alimentazione. In questi primi 49 giorni di gara è stata maniacale e lo sarà fino al 98imo giorno di gara. Vi ricordo che sono partito da più del 17% di massa grassa ed ho fissato il mio obiettivo a 14 settimane al 4%. Obiettivo molto ambizioso già di per se e diventa ancor di più ambizioso, partendo da una soglia così alta e con un età superiore ai 50 anni. Ammetto che per quanto ho fatto e sto facendo, mi aspettavo risultati appena migliori. Certo non posso lamentarmi ed oltretutto io non ricerco perdite di grasso esagerate in breve tempo perché spesso più che grasso si perde peso/muscolo/liquidi e invece io sono per una perdita di circa 0,5 Kg. di grasso a settimana mantenendo e/o aumentando il muscolo/massa magra a tutti i costi. Comunque qui sotto i numeri al giro di boa di metà gara:

    Altezza 178 cm. Età 51 anni e 8 mesi

    Massa grassa: 9,57% – iniziale: 17,5%

    Giro vita: 77 cm – iniziale: 86 cm.

    Massa Magra: 68,45 kg. – iniziale 68,94 Kg.

    Peso totale: 77 Kg. – iniziale: 83 Kg.

    Aggiornamento al 20/08/2013:

    Sono a 4 settimane dalla fine, un tempo abbastanza lungo per il raggiungimento del mio obbiettivo, ma allo stesso tempo abbastanza poco e con poco margine di errore per non fallire. Come ogni anno è così per tutti, anche gli esperti bodybuilder o fitness model, l’ultimo grasso da bruciare è il più testardo (stubborn), il più lento ad andare via e non sempre ci si riesce se non si resta concentrati e confidenti in quello che si sta facendo, senza farsi prendere dal panico. Sto facendo molta attività cardio, maggiormente MTB e running e alterno anche nuoto e HIIT (High Intensity Interval Training) . Il problema è saper individuare quando l’attività cardio è troppa oppure la quantità di macronutrienti è poca in riferimento all’attività svolta e ancor di più conoscendo e sapendo le quantità di macronutrienti in percentuale al totale delle calorie ingerite. Sembra un controsenso, ma aumentando troppo l’attività cardio e riducendo drasticamente le calorie ingerite, il rischio è di vedere rallentare ulteriormente il metabolismo e di rallentare di conseguenza anche la perdita di grasso. Eppure siamo in una situazione di deficit calorico aggressivo e matematicamente dovrei dimagrire tanto settimanalmente. Quello che sulla carta sembra scontato, non sempre trova riscontro nella realtà. Non dimentichiamoci poi che il nostro obiettivo è di perdere solo il grasso e non solo peso e quindi conservando e/o aumentando la massa magra. Questo tipo di difesa dell’organismo avviene appunto nelle fasi finali del dimagrimento e soprattutto se stiamo tagliando troppo e da troppo tempo le calorie. Il raggiungimento della soglia di “plateau” è quasi scontata. Sto facendo i conti anch’io con questa situazione e sulla base dell’esperienza e delle risposte del mio organismo sia attualmente che negli anni passati, adotto strategie diverse che vanno dall’aumentare l’intensità delle sessioni, al tempo o al numero per quanto riguarda l’attività cardio e anche per l’allenamento con i pesi si cerca di modificare l’intensità o il tempo di riposo fra una serie e l’altra o il numero di ripetizioni e ancora la quantità di peso con cui si lavora. E naturalmente agendo sulla parte più importante che è l’alimentazione attivando una dieta ancor più restrittiva e tagliando i carboidrati (come sapete non completamente) e ogni tre giorni invece ricarico i carboidrati e le calorie totali. Nei giorni in cui scarico i carboidrati, per quanto provi a lasciare invariate le quantità di proteine e grassi, se mi alleno sarò obbligato ad agire su questi due macronutrienti aumentandoli per avere un deficit calorico fra calorie utilizzate e quelle ingerite intorno al 20-30%.

    Vediamo i numeri a lunedì 19 agosto e poi ci aggiorneremo definitivamente dopo il 16 settembre che è il termine della Summer Challenge:

    Altezza 178 cm. Età 51 anni e 8 mesi

    Massa grassa: 7,56% – iniziale: 17,5%

    Giro vita: 75,5 cm – iniziale: 86 cm.

    Massa Magra: 68,59 kg. – iniziale 68,94 Kg.

    Peso totale: 74,2 Kg. – iniziale: 83 Kg.

    Aggiornamento al 22/08/2013:

    Goal! L’edizione 2013 della “Burn The Fat Summer Challenge” è terminata. Per me lunedì 16 settembre, per una durata totale di 98 giorni o 14 settimane. Gli ultimi concorrenti hanno terminato giovedì 19 settembre e anche quest’anno su circa 4.000 partecipanti solo 225 hanno portato a termine la sfida. Nuovamente, di questi 225 più della metà non hanno raggiunto significativi risultati/cambiamenti, almeno quelli visibili dalle foto. Hanno solo pubblicato regolarmente le loro statistiche settimanali e le foto finali. Questo ci fa capire che quello che sulla carta può risultare facile, non lo è poi nella realtà.

    Veniamo al mio risultato: ho replicato il risultato dello scorso anno, ma a differenza del 2012, sono partito da un coefficiente di percentuale di massa grassa superiore di oltre 2% e l’obbiettivo che avevo fissato al 4% era veramente molto/troppo ambizioso per essere raggiunto in 98 giorni, per dimagrire ad un tasso conservativo che permettesse di mantenere o anche incrementare la percentuale di massa magra. Sono arrivato al 4,98%, non è cifra tonda, ma per quanto mi riguarda l’obbiettivo è stato raggiunto. Tenete presente poi che ci sono sicuramente parti del corpo che presentano valori più alti e altri più bassi. Se guarderete la foto della schiena, potrete notare la definizione e le striature che indicano una bassissima percentuale di grasso. Inoltre sempre dalle foto, a paragone con quelle dell’anno scorso, mi sembra di avere ottenuto un miglioramento in termini di massa e simmetria e anche per certi aspetti come definizione. Ora attendiamo il giudizio dei giudici che avverrà nei prossimi 20 giorni. Pubblico finalmente qui sotto i dati e le foto finali di questa “Burn The Fat Summer Challenge 2013”:

    Dati Finali al 16 Settembre 2013 – inizio Summer Challenge 10 Giugno 2013:

    Altezza 178 cm. Età 51 anni e 9 mesi

    Massa grassa %: 4,98% – iniziale: 17,5% – Diff. – 12,34%

    Giro vita: 72,5 cm – iniziale: 86 cm. – Diff. – 13,5 cm.

    Massa Magra: 69,68 kg. – iniziale 68,94 Kg. – Diff. + 1,19 Kg.

    Massa Grassa: 3,62 Kg. – iniziale 14,31 Kg. – Diff. – 10,69 Kg.

    Peso totale: 74,2 Kg. – iniziale: 83 Kg. – Diff. – 9,5 Kg.

    Dalla tabella si vede che ho perso più di 10kg. di grasso e ho incrementato di oltre un chilo la massa magra. Questo senza l’aiuto di steroidi, altrimenti i risultati della massa magra sarebbero ben diversi. Di seguito le foto:

    Foto Frontali

    P1000853_cutresFB
    Frontale inizio
    Clicca sull’immagine per ingrandire
    P1010076_cut_FB
    Frontale finale
    Clicca sull’immagine per ingrandire

    Foto Laterali

    P1000857_cutresFB
    Laterale inizio
    Clicca sull’immagine per ingrandire
    P1010081_cut_FB
    Laterale finale
    Clicca sull’immagine per ingrandire

    Schiena

    P1000859_cutres
    Schiena inizio
    Clicca sull’immagine per ingrandire
    P1010061_cut_FB
    Schiena Finale
    Clicca sull’immagine per ingrandire

    Confronto Schiena 2010 – 2013 

    Summer Challenge 2010 2011 2012 2013 comparison back
    Clicca sull’immagine per
    ingrandire

    Credo che dalla foto del confronto di schiena degli ultimi quattro anni, si noti l’evoluzione in meglio della crescita muscolare, ma soprattutto della simmetria e definizione dovuta soprattutto ad una perdita maggiore di grasso. Certo la luce nelle foto può giocare un ruolo importante, ma credo sia oggettivo il cambiamento. Allenarsi e nutrirsi con disciplina e volontà alla fine ripaga sempre. E ricordate che per quanto duramente vi allenerete, se non sarete scrupolosi sul piano dell’alimentazione, vedrete naufragare tutti i vostri sforzi.

    Ecco! Questi sono i dati e le foto di questa nuova sfida portata a termine dopo 98 giorni, il mio premio è già stato vinto ed è quello di aver raggiunto l’obbiettivo che avevo fissato. Adesso è arrivato anche il riconoscimento visto che sono stato inserito nei top 10 finalisti uomini. Essere nella classifica dei Top 10 su circa 4.000 partecipanti è già un onore e una soddisfazione per cui essere grati .

    © Copyright Piero Maina – Tutti i diritti riservati

  • Everything You Need To Know About Loose Skin And Weight Loss

    Everything You Need To Know About Loose Skin And Weight Loss

    Title: Everything You Need To Know About Loose Skin And Weight Loss
    By line: By Tom Venuto, CSCS, NSCA-CPT
    URL: www.BurnTheFat.com
    Word count: 1142 words
    Description: If you’re extremely overweight or if you’ve been extremely overweight in the past, then you know that getting rid of excess weight is only one of the challenges you face. Once the fat is gone, you are often confronted with an equally frustrating cosmetic problem; Loose skin. Dont’ consider surgery until you’ve read this.

    Everything You Need To Know About Loose Skin And Weight Loss By Tom Venuto, NSCA-CPT, CSCS www.BurnTheFat.com

    I receive a lot of e-mail from people with loose skin or from overweight people who are concerned about having loose skin after they lose the weight. In fact, this is one of the biggest concerns and most frequently asked questions I receive from men and women who have a lot of weight to lose.

    Just recently, I received this email from a reader of my syndicated “Ask Tom” fat loss column:

    “Tom, I began a fat loss program using your Burn The Fat system and it worked so well I got down to 15 1/2 stones (from 19). However, this has caused me a problem: Excess abdominal skin. I didn’t crash lose this weight, it came off at the rate of about 2 lbs. per week just like you recommended. Now I’m unsure of whether to carry on, as my abdomen has quite a lot of excess skin – I feel like I’ve turned into a bloody Shar-Pei! Does everyone go through this? Will the skin tighten up? I was overweight for more than 12 years. Am I going to end up needing surgical skin removal? Can you offer me any advice? I’m a medical student in the UK and my colleagues seem determined to proffer surgery as the only option.”

    There are 14 things you should know about loose skin after very large weight losses:

    1. Skin is incredibly elastic. Your skin can stretch and expand or tighten and retract to a great degree. Look at what women go through during pregnancy. Some women do experience stretch marks after pregnancy, but obviously skin is remarkably elastic.            

    2. Elasticity of skin depends on both genetics and environment/lifestyle. Wrinkling and loss of elasticity is partly the consequence of aging (genetic factors) and also a result of environmental factors such as oxidative stress, excessive sun exposure, and nutritional deficiency. The environmental parts you can fix, the genetics and age part, you cannot. Advice: Get moving and change the things you have control over… Be realistic and don’t worry about those things you don’t have control over.

    3. How much your skin returns to its former tautness depends partly on age. The older you get, the more an extremely large weight loss can leave loose skin that will not return to normal.

    4. How long you carry extra weight may influence how much the skin will become taut after the weight loss: For example, compare a 9 month pregnancy with 9 years carrying 100 excess pounds.

    5. How much weight was carried has a lot to do with how much the skin will resume a tight appearance. Your skin can only be stretched so much and be expected to “snap back” one hundred percent. With extreme obesity, the probability of there still being loose skin after weight loss is higher.

    6. How fast the weight was gained also has a lot to do with how much the skin will resume a tight appearance. Your skin can only be stretched so quickly and be expected to “snap back.”

    7. How fast weight is lost also has a lot to do with how much the skin will tighten up. Rapid weight loss doesn’t allow the skin time to slowly resume to normal. (This is yet another reason to lose fat slowly; 1-2 pounds per week, 3 pounds at the most if you have a lot of weight to lose, and even then, only if you are measuring body fat and you’re certain it’s fat you’re losing, not lean tissue).

    8. There are exceptions to all of the above; For example, people who gained and then lost incredible amounts of weight quickly at age 50 or 60, and their skin returned 100% to normal.

    9. Creams probably don’t work. There are many creams advertised as having the ability to restore the tightness of your skin. the late bodybuilding guru Dan duchaine used to recommend topical creams made with pycnogenol, which contain the antioxidant bioflavanoids called proanthocyanidins. But to the best of my knowledge, none of the topical creams are scientifically validated. I haven’t even heard much anecdotal evidence that they work — at least not permanently and measurably — and especially if you have a lot of loose skin. There are definitely some topicals that will pull water from under your skin, but remeber, that is temporary. Buyer should beware with topical products. (as an aside, Ive also heard anectodal reports that skin brushing was helpful, but again, I am not aware of any scientific evidence proving this is effective).

    10. Nutrition has a lot to do with the health of your skin. Essential fatty acids in particular are very valuable for many reasons, and one of them is for the health of your skin. It would be worth taking an EFA supplement such as fish oil, flax oil or an oil blend like Udo’s choice. Antioxidants are also very important, so be sure to consume copious amounts of a variety of vegetables and fruits. Also pay very close attention to hydration. Drink approximately a gallon of water a day or a minimum of half your body weight in ounces. (By the way, whey protein is high in a powerful antioxidant called glutathione).

    11. Exercise has a lot to do with how your skin appears after you lose body fat. If you use very low calorie diets, you are likely to lose lean body mass, and this is going to exacerbate the loose, hanging skin appearance. On the other hand, if you are exercising regularly and increasing lean body mass with weight training, you will be more likely to minimize the appearance of loose skin.

    12. Get second opinions if you are considering surgery.If you’re considering surgical skin removal, consult a physician for advice because this is not a minor operation, but keep in mind that your plastic surgeon may be making his BMW payments with your abdominoplasty money. (Surgery might be recommended in situations where it’s not 100% necessary). Surgery should be left as the absolute final option in extreme cases.

    13. Give your skin time. Your skin will definitely get tighter as your body fat gets lower. I’ve seen and heard of many cases where the skin gradually tightened up, at least partially, after a one or two year period where the weight loss was maintained and exercise continued.

    14. Know your body fat percentage before even thinking about surgery. Loose skin is one thing, but still having a lot of body fat is another. Be honest with yourself and do that by taking your body fat measurement. This can be done with skinfold calipers or a variety of other devices (calipers might not be the best method if you have large folds of loose skin. Look into impedance analysis, underwater weighing, DEXA or Bod Pod).

    Suppose for example, a man drops from 35% body fat all the way down to 20%. He should be congratulated, but I would tell him, “Don’t complain about loose skin yet, your body fat is still high. Press onward and keep getting leaner and be sure to focus on strength training to increase lean body mass as well.”

    Average body fat for men is in the mid teens (16% or so). Average body fat for women is in the 20-25% range. Good body fat for men is 10-12%, and single digits is extremely lean. Men shouldn’t expect to look “ripped” with 100% tight skin on the abs unless they have single digit body fat. Women shouldn’t expect to have tight abdominal skin unless they are in the low to mid teens in body fat.

    Except in extreme cases, you are actually unlikely to see someone with loose skin who has very low body fat and especially someone who has not just “lost weight” but has altered body composition by adding lean muscle as well. It’s quite remarkable how much your skin can tighten up once your body fat goes from “average” to “excellent” and even more so when lean body mass increase. Someone with legitimate single digit body fat and a ton of loose skin is a rare sight.

    So the key to getting tighter skin is to improve your body composition (muscle to fat ratio), and lose more body fat, slowly and sensibly, up to the point where your body composition rating is BETTER than average (in the “good” to “great” category, not just “okay”). Only AFTER you reach your long term body fat percentage goal should you give thought to “excess skin removal.” At that point, admittedly, there are bound to be a few isolated cases where surgery is necessary if you can’t live with the amount of loose skin remaining.

    However, unless you are really, really lean, it’s difficult to get a clear picture of what is loose skin, what is just remaining body fat and how much further the skin will tighten up when the rest of the fat is lost.

    Need help getting rid of that last bit of body body fat? Click here to find out how to do it the natural way: www.BurnTheFat.com            

    About the Author:

    Tom Venuto is a lifetime natural bodybuilder, an NSCA-certified personal trainer (CPT), certified Tom Venuto 8

    strength & conditioning specialist (CSCS), and author of the #1 best-

    selling e-book, “Burn the Fat, Feed The Muscle.” Tom has written

    more than 200 articles and has been featured in print magazines

    such as IRONMAN, Australian IRONMAN, Natural Bodybuilding,

    Muscular Development, Exercise for Men and Men’s Exercise, as

    well as on hundreds of websites worldwide. For information on

    Tom’s Fat Loss program, visit: www.BurnTheFat.com            

  • Protein Supplements Vs. Protein Foods

    Protein Supplements Vs. Protein Foods

    Title:Protein Supplements Vs. Protein Foods
    By line: By Tom Venuto, NSCA-CPT, CSCS
    URL: www.BurnTheFat.com
    Word count: 2455 words

    Protein Supplements Vs. Protein Foods? By Tom Venuto, NSCA-CPT, CSCS www.BurnTheFat.com

    Are protein supplements really better than protein foods? Before attempting to answer this question, I should first preface it by mentioning that I do not sell supplements, nor am I associated with any supplement company, so you’re getting an honest and unbiased opinion. Don’t get me wrong; I am not anti-supplement by any means. It would simply be more accurate to say that I am “pro-food.” There are a lot of good supplements on the market, and I’ve used many of them, including a multi vitamin, creatine and essential fatty acid (EFA) supplements such as Flaxseed oil. Protein powders and meal replacements can also be indispensable if you don’t have time to eat every three hours. However, protein supplements are not the master key to your success, real food is!

    Did you ever notice how articles about protein in certain bodybuilding magazines are seldom objective? Instead, they all seem to be slanted towards hyping some “revolutionary” new product. Did you ever wonder why? In my opinion, most articles on protein supplements are nothing more than thinly disguised advertisements (some very thinly). Sometimes they give you a very persuasive-sounding argument, replete with dozens of references from scientific studies (mostly done on rodents, of course). They even give you an 800 number at the end of the article to order. (How convenient!)

    When protein manufacturers throw around fancy words like cross flow microfiltration, oligopeptides, ion-exchange, protein efficiency ratio, biological value, nitrogen retention and glycomacropeptides, it sure sounds convincing, especially when scores of scientific references are cited. But don’t forget that the supplement industry is big business and most magazines are the supplement industry. Lyle McDonald, author of “The Ketogenic Diet,” hit the nail on the head when he wrote “Unfortunately, the obsession that bodybuilders have with protein has made them susceptible to all kinds of marketing hype. Like most aspects of bodybuilding (and the supplement industry in general), the issue of protein is driven more by marketing hype than physiological reality and marketing types know how to push a bodybuilder’s button when it comes to protein “

    Many nutrition “experts” (read: people who sell supplements), state that there are distinct advantages of protein supplements (powders and amino acid tablets) over whole foods. For example, they argue that whey, a by-product of the cheese-making process, is a higher quality protein than most whole food sources. There are many different methods of determining protein quality, including biological value (BV), protein efficiency ratio (PER), Net Protein Utilization (NPU), chemical score, and protein digestibility corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS). If you have ever seen advertisements for protein powders and supplements, you have undoubtedly heard of one or more of these measures of protein quality.

    BV is one of the most commonly used and is arguably, the best measure of a protein’s quality. BV is based on how much of the protein consumed is actually absorbed and utilized by the body. The higher the amount of protein (nitrogen) that is actually retained, the greater the BV. If a protein has a BV of 100, it means that all of the protein absorbed has been utilized with none lost. Whole eggs score the highest of all foods with a BV of 100, while beans have a BV of only 49.

    Protein quality is certainly an important issue, but it is one that has been enormously overstated and even distorted for marketing purposes. Whey protein is truly an excellent protein with a biological value at or near 100. Many advertisements list whey as having a BV between 104 and 157, but if you look in any nutrition textbook it will tell you that it is impossible to have a BV over 100. In “Advanced Nutrition and Human Metabolism,” BV is defined as “a measure of nitrogen retained for growth and/or maintenance that is expressed as a percentage of nitrogen absorbed.”

    When a protein supplement is listed as having a BV over 100, the company has intentionally manipulated the number for marketing purposes or unintentionally confused BV with another method of rating protein quality. Certain whey proponents claim that whey is “superior to whole egg” so the percentage sign on BV had to be dropped and the scale extended beyond 100. It was noted by bodybuilding writer Jerry Branium in IRONMAN magazine that in a study where the BV of whey was reported to be 157, the author confused BV with chemical score. Chemical score is a comparison of the amino acid pattern in an ideal reference protein to a test protein and therefore the number can exceed 100. 157 was actually the chemical score and not the BV.

    Most bodybuilders and strength athletes already consume more than enough protein (an understatement if there ever was one), so the importance of BV to these athletes who are already consuming copious amounts of protein has been overplayed. Even though whey has a higher BV than chicken breast, fish or milk protein, if the total quantity of protein you consume is sufficient, then it is not likely that substituting whey for food proteins will result in any additional muscle growth.

    Whether you choose a whole protein food or a protein supplement isn’t as important as some would like you to believe. For the purposes of developing muscle, the only guidelines for protein that you must follow are: (1) consume a source of complete protein with every meal, (2) eat at frequent intervals approximately three hours apart (about six times per day) and (3) consume a minimum of .8 grams to 1 gram per pound of body weight. There are times when it would be beneficial to consume more than one gram per pound of body weight, but that will have to be the subject of another article.

    Because whey protein does have a high BV, it probably offers the most benefits when you are dieting on very low calories. When your energy intake and correspondingly, your protein intake, are reduced, whey protein could help you get greater utilzation of the smaller amount of protein that you are taking in. In other words, choosing proteins of the highest quality is more of an issue when you are dieting than when you are focusing on mass gains when total calories and protein are being consumed in abundant amounts. Whey protein also provides a way to get high quality protein without the fat, which is also important when dieting.

    It has been suggested that whey may have other advantages besides high protein quality, although they are frequently overstated. These benefits include enhanced immunity, increased antioxidant activity and quick absorption. Several studies in “Clinical and Investigative Science” by Dr. Gerard Bounous of Montreal have shown that whey protein provides anti carcinogenic properties, protection from infections, and other enhanced immune responses. Whey protein was also been shown to raise levels of Glutathione, an important antioxidant that can offer protection from free radical oxidative damage. While such findings are very promising, all these studies, which are frequently quoted in whey protein advertisements, were performed on mice, so it is unclear how well the results extrapolate to humans.

    Another acknowledged benefit of whey protein is its fast absorption rate. Although there isn’t any evidence that protein supplements digest more efficiently than whole foods (as is often claimed), they are definitely digested faster. This is most important after a training session when the rates of protein synthesis and glycogen re-synthesis are increased. This is the reason it is often recommended that a liquid meal containing protein and a high glycemic carbohydrate be consumed immediately post-workout and that whey is the ideal protein for this purpose. Even in considering post-workout nutrition, there is still little proof that a liquid protein-carb complex will actually produce better muscular growth than whole foods, as long as complete whole food protein foods and complex carbohydrates are consumed immediately after the training session and every three waking hours for a period of 24 hours thereafter.

    Speaking of protein absorption rates, the discussion of fast acting versus slow acting proteins seems to be the latest hot topic these days in bodybuilding circles. The interest was sparked by studies in 1997 and 1998 that examined the differences between the absorption rates of whey versus casein. The researchers concluded that whey was a fast acting protein and was considered to be more “anabolic” while casein was slower acting and was considered to be more “anti-catabolic. ” It was further hypothesized that consuming a combination of these two types of proteins could lead to greater muscle growth. These findings have prompted the supplement companies to market an entirely new category of protein supplements; casein and whey mixes. The problem with drawing such conclusions so quickly is that these studies looked at the speed of whey and casein absorption in subjects who had fasted for 10 hours before being fed the protein. Any suppositions drawn from this information are probably irrelevant if you are eating mixed whole food meals every three hours. Obviously, more research is needed.

    This recent fascination with various rates of protein absorption could be compared to the interest in the glycemic index. The glycemic index is a scale that measures the rate at which the body converts various carbohydrate foods into blood glucose. The higher the glycemic index, the faster the food is converted to glucose and the larger the insulin response. Therefore it is said that high glycemic foods should be avoided in favor of low glycemic index foods. The error in relying solely on the glycemic index as your only criteria for choosing carbohydrates is that the index is based on consuming a carbohydrate food by itself in a fasted state.

    When carbohydrates are consumed in mixed meals that contain protein and a little fat, the glycemic index loses some of its significance because the protein and fat slow the absorption of the carbohydrate. That’s why the glycemic index is really much ado about nothing and the same could probably be said for the casein and whey argument. It’s just the latest in a long string of new angles that supplement companies use to promote their protein: free-form vs peptides, concentrate vs isolate, ion exchange vs microfiltration, soy vs whey, casein and whey mix vs pure whey and so on. Every year, you can count on some new twist on the protein story to appear. Certainly there are going to be advances in nutrition science, but all too often these “new discoveries” amount to nothing more than marketing hype.

    What about amino acid pills? Amino acids pills are simply predigested protein. Proponents of amino acid supplementation claim that because the amino’s are predigested, the body will absorb them better, leading to greater improvements in strength and muscle mass. It sounds logical, but this is a gross underestimation of the body’s capacities and actually the reverse is true: The human digestive system was designed to efficiently process whole foods; it was not designed to digest pills and powders all day long. Amino’s are absorbed more rapidly in the intestine when they are in the more complex di and tri-peptide molecules.

    Your body gets better use of the aminos as protein foods are broken down and the amino’s are absorbed at just the right rate for your body’s needs. In “Exercise Physiology; Energy Nutrition and Human Performance,” authors Katch and McArdle state that “Amino acid supplementation in any form has not been shown by adequate experimental design and methodology to increase muscle mass or significantly improve muscular strength, power, or endurance.”

    Furthermore, consuming predigested protein when you are seeking fat loss is not necessarily advantageous because it shortchanges you of the thermic effects of real food. Whole foods have a major advantage over protein supplements; they stimulate the metabolism more. This is known as the “thermic effect of food.” Protein has the highest thermic effect of any food. Including a whole protein food with every meal can speed up your metabolic rate as much as 30% because of the energy necessary to digest, process, and absorb it. This means that out of 100 calories of a protein food such as chicken breast, the net amount of calories left over after processing it is 70. In this respect, the fact that protein foods digest slower than amino acid tablets is actually an advantage.

    A final argument against amino acid supplements is the cost. Amino’s are simply not cost effective. If you don’t believe it, pick up a bottle and do the math yourself. One popular brand of “free form and peptide bonded amino acids” contains 150 1000mg. tablets per bottle and costs $19.95. 1000 mg. of amino acids equals 1 gram of protein, so the entire bottle contains 150 grams of protein. $19.95 divided by 150 grams is 13.3 cents per gram. Let’s compare that to chicken breast. I can buy chicken breast from my local supermarket for $2.99 a pound. According to Corinne Netzer’s “Complete Book of Food Counts,” there are 8.8 grams of protein in each ounce of chicken, so one pound of chicken (16 oz) has about 140 grams of protein. $2.99 divided by 140 grams equals 2.1 cents per gram. The amino acids cost more than six times what the chicken breast does! I don’t know about you, but I’ll stick with the chicken breast.

    The biggest advantage of protein supplements is not that they can build more muscle than chicken or egg whites or any other whole food protein, the biggest advantage is convenience. It is easier to drink a protein shake than it is to buy, prepare, cook and eat poultry, fish or egg whites. Consuming small, frequent meals is the optimal way to eat, regardless of whether your goal is fat loss or muscle gain. To keep your body constantly in positive nitrogen balance, you must consume a complete protein every three hours. For many people, eating this often is nearly impossible. That’s when a high quality protein supplement is the most helpful.

    Aside from convenience, the truth about protein supplements is that they offer few advantages over protein foods. There is no scientific evidence that you can’t meet all of your protein needs for muscle growth through food. As long as you eat every three hours and you eat a complete protein such as eggs, lean meat or lowfat dairy products with every meal, it is not necessary to consume any protein supplements to get outstanding results. Whey protein does have some interesting and useful properties and supplementing with a couple scoops each day is not a bad idea, especially if you are on a low calorie diet for fat loss or when you’re using a post workout shake instead of a meal. Aside from that, focus on real food and don’t believe the hype.

    References

    1) Groff, James, et al, Advanced Nutrition and Human Metabolism, West Publishing company, 1995.

    2) Fruhbeck, Gema. Slow and fast dietary proteins. Nature, 391: 843-844

    3) Boirie, Y. et al. Slow and fast dietary proteins differently modulate postprandial protein accretion. Proc National Acad Sci, 94: 14930-14935, 1997

    4) Lemon, Peter, Protein and Exercise: update, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Vol 19, No. 5, S179 – S190, 1987

    5) Carraro, F., et at, Effect of exercise and recovery on muscle protein synthesis in human subjects. Amer Journal of physiology, 259: E470, 1990

    6) Lemon, Peter, Is increased dietary protein necessary or beneficial for individuals with a physically active lifestyle? Nutrition reviews, 54:S 169-175, 1996

    7)Bounous, G., et al, The immunoenhancing property of dietary whey protein concentrate. Clinical and Investigational Medicine, 11: 271-278. 1988.

    8) Sadler, R., The benefits of dietary whey protein concentrate on the immune response and health. S Afr. J Dairy Sci, 24: No 24, 1992

    9) Bounous, G., Dietary whey protein inhibits the development of dimethylhydrazine-induced malignancy. Clinical and Investigational Medicine, 12: 213-217, 1988

    10) Bounous, G., et al, The biological activity of undenatured dietary whey protein; role of glutathione. Clinical and Investigational Medicine, 14: 4, 296-309, 1991

    11) Netzer, Corinne. The Complete Book of Food Counts. Dell Publishing, 1997

    12) Katch, Katch & McArdle, Exercise Physiology; Energy, Nutrition and Human Performance, Wiliams and Wilkins, 1996.

    About the Author:

    Tom Venuto is a natural bodybuilder and author of the #1 best selling e-book, “Burn theTom Venuto 8

    Fat, Feed The Muscle,” which teaches you how to burn

    fat without drugs or supplements using the little-known

    secrets of the world’s best bodybuilders and fitness

    models. Learn how to get rid of stubborn fat and turbo-

    charge your metabolism by visiting:

    www.BurnTheFat.com.

  • 3500 Calories To Lose A Pound: Is This Formula All Wrong?

    3500 Calories To Lose A Pound: Is This Formula All Wrong?

    Title: 3500 Calories To Lose A Pound – Is This Formula All Wrong?
    By line: By Tom Venuto, CSCS, NSCA-CPT
    URL: www.BurnTheFat.com
    Word count: 1256 words

    3500 Calories To Lose A Pound – Is This Formula All Wrong? By Tom Venuto, NSCA-CPT, CSCS www.BurnTheFat.com

    Most fitness conscious people have heard that there are 3,500 calories in a pound of fat, so if you create a deficit of 3500 calories in a week, you lose a pound of weight. If you create a deficit of 7000 calories in a week, you lose two pounds, and so on. Right? Well, not so fast…

    Dr. Kevin Hall, an investigator at the National Institute of Health in Bethesda has done some interesting research about the mechanisms regulating human body weight. He recently published a new paper in the International Journal of Obesity that throws a wrench in works of the “3500 calories to lose a pound” idea.

    Some of the equations in his paper made my head hurt, but despite the complex math he used to come to his conclusions, his article clearly prompts the question, “3500 calories to lose a pound of WHAT?” His paper also contained a lot of simple and practical tips you can use to properly balance your caloric intake with output, fine tune your calorie deficit and help you retain more muscle when you diet.

    Below, I’ve distilled some of the information into a simple bullet-point summary that any non-scientist can understand. Then I wrap up with my interpretation of how you can apply this data in your own fat loss program:

    Calculating the calories required to lose a pound and fine-tuning your caloric deficit

    • 3500 calories to lose a pound has always been the rule of thumb. However, this 3500 calories figure goes back to research which assumed that all the weight lost would be adipose tissue (which would be ideal, of course).
    • But as we all know (unfortunately), lean body mass is lost along with body fat, which would indicate that the 3500 calorie figure could be an oversimplification.
    • The amount of lean body mass lost is based on initial body fat level and size of the calorie deficit
    • Lean people tend to lose more lean body mass and retain more fat.
    • Fat people tend to lose more body fat and retain more lean tissue (revealing why obese people can tolerate aggressive low calorie diets better than already lean people)
    • Very aggressive low calorie diets tend to erode lean body mass to a greater degree than more conservative diets.
    • whether the weight loss is lean or fat gives you the real answer of what is the required energy deficit per unit of weight loss
    • The metabolizable energy in fat is different than the metabolizable energy in muscle tissue. A pound of muscle is not 3500 calories. A pound of muscle yields about 600 calories.
    • If you lose lean body mass, then you lose more weight than if you lose fat.
    • If you create a 3500 calorie deficit in one week and you lose 100% body fat, you will lose one pound.
    • But if you create a 3500 calorie weekly deficit and as a result of that deficit, lose 100% muscle, you would lose almost 6 pounds of body weight! (of course, if you manage to lose 100% muscle, you will be forced to wear the Dieter’s Dunce cap)
    • If you have a high initial body fat percentage, then you are going to lose more fat relative to lean, so you may need a larger deficit to lose the same amount of weight as compared to a lean person
    • Creating a calorie deficit once at the beginning of a diet and maintaining that same caloric intake for the duration of the diet and after major weight loss fails to account for how your body decreases energy expenditure with reduced body weight
    • Weight loss typically slows down over time for a prescribed constant diet (the “plateau”). This is either due to the decreased metabolism mentioned above, or a relaxing of the diet compliance, or both (most people just can’t hack aggressive calorie reductions for long)
    • Progressive resistance training and or high protein diets can modify the proportion of weight lost from body fat versus lean tissue (which is why weight training and sufficient protein while on calorie restricted diets are absolute musts!)

    So, based on this info, should you throw out the old calorie formulas?

    Well, not necessarily. You can still use the standard calorie formulas to figure out how much you should eat, and you can use a 500-1000 calorie per day deficit (below maintenance) as a generic guideline to figure where to set your calories to lose one or two pounds per week respectively (at least that works “on paper” anyway).

    Even better however, you could use this info to fine tune your caloric deficit using a percentage method and also base your deficit on your starting body fat level, to get a much more personalized and effective approach:

    15-20% below maintenance calories = conservative deficit

    20-25% below maintenance calories = moderate deficit

    25-30% below maintenance calories = aggressive deficit

    31-40% below maintenance calories = very aggressive deficit (risky)

    50%+ below maintenance calories = semi starvation/starvation (potentially dangerous and unhealthy)

    (Note: According to exercise physiologists Katch& Mcardle, the average female between the ages of 23 and 50 has a maintenance level of about 2000-2100 calories per day and the average male about 2700-2900 calories per day)

    Usually, we would suggest starting with a conservative deficit of around 15-20% below maintenance. Based on this research, however, we see that there can be a big difference between lean and overweight people in how many calories they can or should cut.

    If you have very high body fat to begin with, the typical rule of thumb on calorie deficits may underestimate the deficit required to lose a pound. It may also be too conservative, and you can probably use a more aggressive deficit safely without as much worry about muscle loss or metabolic slowdown.

    If you are extremely lean, like a bodybuilder trying to get ready for competition, you would want to be very cautious about using aggressive calorie deficits. You’d be better off keeping the deficit conservative and starting your diet/cutting phase earlier to allow for a slow, but safe rate of fat loss, with maximum retention of muscle tissue.

    The bottom line is that it’s not quite so simple as 3,500 calories being the deficit to lose a pound. Like lots of other things in nutrition that vary from person to person, the ideal amount of calories to cut “depends”…

    Note: The Burn the Fat, Feed The Muscle program not only has an entire chapter dedicated to helping you calculate your exact calorie needs, it was designed very specifically to keep a fairly conservative approach to caloric deficits and to maximize the amount of lean tissue you retain and minimize the amount of metabolic adaptation that occurs when you’re dieting. The approach may be more conservative, and the fat loss may be slower, but it has a better long term track record… You can either lose weight fast, sacrifice muscle and gain the fat back like 95% of people do, or lose fat slow and keep it off forever like the 5% of the people who know the secrets. The choice is yours. For more information, visit: http://www.burnthefat.com

    References:

    Forbes GB. Body fat content influences the body composition response to nutrition and exercise. Ann NY Acad Sci. 904: 359-365. 2000

    Hall, KD., What is the required energy deficit per unit of weight loss? Int J Obesity. 2007 Epub ahead of print.

    McArdle WD. Exercise physiology: Energy, Nutrition, and Human performance. 4td ed. Williams & Wilkins. 1996.

    Wishnofsky M. Caloric equivalents of gained or lost weight. Am J Clin Nutr. 6: 542-546.

    About the Author:

    Tom Venuto is a natural bodybuilder, certified strength and conditioning specialistTom Venuto 8

    (CSCS) and a certified personal trainer (CPT). Tom is the

    author of “Burn the Fat, Feed The Muscle,” which teaches

    you how to get lean without drugs or supplements using

    methods of the world’s best bodybuilders and fitness

    models. Learn how to get rid of stubborn fat and increase

    your metabolism by visiting: www.BurnTheFat.com

  • Steady State Cardio 5 X More Effective Than HIIT????

    Steady State Cardio 5 X More Effective Than HIIT????

    Title: Steady State Cardio 5 X More Effective Than HIIT????
    By line: By Tom Venuto, CSCS, NSCA-CPT
    URL: www.BurnTheFat.com

    Word count: 1860 words

    Steady State Cardio 5 X More Effective Than HIIT????

    By Tom Venuto, NSCA-CPT, CSCS www.BurnTheFat.com

    High Intensity Interval Training, or HIIT for short, has been promoted as one of the most effective training methods ever to come down the pike, both for fat loss and for cardiovascular fitness. One of the most popular claims for HIIT is that it burns “9 times more fat” than conventional (steady state) cardio. This figure was extracted from a study performed by Angelo Tremblay at Laval University in 1994. But what if I told you that HIIT has never been proven to be 9 times more effective than regular cardio… What if I told you that the same study actually shows that HIIT is 5 times less effective than steady state cardio??? Read on and see the proof for yourself.

    “There are lies, damned lies, and then there are statistics.”

    – Mark Twain

    In 1994, a study was published in the scientific journal Metabolism by Angelo Tremblay and his team from the Physical Activity Sciences Laboratory at Laval University in Quebec, Canada. Based on the results of this study, you hear personal trainers across the globe claiming that “HIIT burns 9 times more fat than steady state cardio.”

    This claim has often been interpreted by the not so scientifically literate public as meaning something like this: If you burned 3 pounds of fat in 15 weeks on steady state cardio, you would now burn 27 pounds of fat in 15 weeks (3 lbs X 9 times better = 27 lbs).

    Although it’s usually not stated as such, frankly, I think this is what some trainers want you to believe, because the programs that some trainers promote are based on convincing you of the vast superiority of HIIT and the “uselessness” of low intensity exercise.

    Indeed, higher intensity exercise is more effective and time efficient than lower intensity exercise. The question is, how much more effective? There’s no evidence that the “9 times more fat loss” claim is true outside the specific context in which it was mentioned in this study.

    In order to get to the bottom of this, you have to read the full text of the research paper and you have to look very closely at the results.

    13 men and 14 women age 18 to 32 started the study. They were broken into two groups, a high intensity intermittent training program (HIIT) and a steady state training program which they referred to as endurance training (ET).

    The ET group completed a 20 week steady state aerobic training program on a cycle ergometer 4 times a week for 30 minutes, later progressing to 5 times per week for 45 minutes. The initial intensity was 60% of maximal heart rate reserve, later increasing to 85%.

    The HIIT group performed 25-30 minutes of continuous exercise at 70% of maximal heart rate reserve and they also progressively added 35 long and short interval training sessions over a period of 15 weeks. Short work intervals started at 10 then 15 bouts of 15 seconds, increasing to 30 seconds. Long intervals started at 5 bouts of 60 seconds, increasing to 90 seconds. Intensity and duration were progressively increased over the 15 week period.

    The results: 3 times greater fat loss in the HIIT group

    Even though the energy cost of the exercise performed in the ET group was twice as high as the HIIT group, the sum of the skinfolds (which reflects subcutaneous body fat) in the HIIT group was three times lower than the ET group.

    So where did the “9 times greater fat loss” claim come from?

    Well, there was a difference in energy cost between groups, so in order to show a comparison of fat loss relative to energy cost, Tremblay wrote,

    “It appeared reasonable to correct changes in subcutaneous fat for the total cost of training. This was performed by expressing changes in subcutaneous skinfolds per megajoule of energy expended in each program.”

    Translation: The subjects did not lose 9 times more body fat, in absolute terms. But hey, 3 times more fat loss? You’ll gladly take that, right?

    Well hold on, because there’s more. Did you know that in this oft-quoted study, neither group lost much weight? In fact, if you look at the charts, you can see that the HIIT group lost 0.1 kg (63.9 kg before, 63.8 kg after). Yes, the HIIT group lost a whopping 100 grams of weight in 15 weeks!

    The ET group lost 0.5 kilograms (60.6 kg before, 60.1 kg after).

    Naturally, lack of weight loss while skinfolds decrease could simply mean that body composition improved (lean mass increased), but I think it’s important to highlight the fact that the research study from which the “9 times more fat” claim was derived did not result in ANY significant weight loss after 15 weeks.Based on these results, if I wanted to manipulate statistics to promote steady state cardio, I could go around telling people, “Research study says steady state cardio (endurance training) results in 5 times more weight loss than high intensity interval training!” Or the reverse, “Clinical trial proves that high intensity interval training is 5 times less effective than steady state cardio!”

    Mind you, THIS IS THE SAME STUDY THAT IS MOST OFTEN QUOTED TO SUPPORT HIIT!

    If I said 5 X greater weight loss with steady state, I would be telling the truth, wouldn’t I? (100 grams of weight loss vs 500 grams?) Of course, that would be misleading because the weight loss was hardly significant in either group and because interval training IS highly effective. I’m simply being a little facetious in order to make a point: Be careful with statistics. I have seen statistical manipulation used many times in other contexts to deceive unsuspecting consumers.

    For example, advertisements for a popular fat burner claim that use of their supplement resulted in twice as much fat loss, based on scientific research. The claim was true. Of course, in the ad, they forget to tell you that after six months, the control group lost no weight, while the supplement group lost only 1.0 kilo. Whoop de doo! ONE KILO of weight loss after going through a six month supply of this “miracle fat burner!”

    But I digress…

    Back to the HIIT story – there’s even more to it.

    In the ET group, there were some funky skinfold and circumference measurements. ALL of the skinfold measurements in the ET group either stayed the same or went down except the calf measurement, which went up.

    The girths and skinfold measurements in the limbs went down in the HIIT group, but there wasn’t much difference between HIIT and ET in the trunk skinfolds. These facts are all very easy to miss. I didn’t even notice it myself until exercise physiologist Christian Finn pointed it out to me. Christian said,

    “When you look at the changes in the three skinfold measurements taken from the trunk, there wasn’t that much difference between the steady state group (-6.3mm) and the HIIT group (-8.7 mm). So, much of the difference in subcutaneous fat loss between the groups wasn’t because the HIIT group lost more fat, but because the steady state group actually gained fat around the calf muscles. We shouldn’t discount simple measurement error as an explanation for these rather odd results.”

    Christian also pointed out that the two test groups were not evenly matched for body composition at the beginning of the study. At the beginning of the study, the starting body fat based on skinfolds in the HIIT group was nearly 20% higher than the ET group. He concluded:

    “So while this study is interesting, weaknesses in the methods used to track changes in body composition mean that we should treat the results and conclusions with some caution.”

    One beneficial aspect of HIIT that most trainers forget to mention is that HIIT may actually suppress your appetite, while steady state cardio might increase appetite. In a study such as this, however, that can skew the results. If energy intake were not controlled, then some of the greater fat loss in the HIIT group could be due to lowered caloric intake.

    Last but not least, I’d like to highlight the words of the researchers themselves in the conclusion of the paper, which confirms the effectiveness of HIIT, but also helps put it in perspective a bit:

    “For a given level of energy expenditure, a high intensity training program induces a greater loss of subcutaneous fat compared with a training program of moderate intensity.”

    “It is obvious that high intensity exercise cannot be prescribed for individuals at risk for health problems or for obese people who are not used to exercise. In these cases, the most prudent course remains a low intensity exercise program with a progressive increase in duration and frequency of sessions.”

    In conclusion, my intention in writing this article wasn’t to be controversial, to be a smart-alec or to criticize HIIT. To the contrary, additional research has continued to support the efficacy of HIIT for fat loss and fitness, not to mention that it is one of the most time efficient ways to do cardiovascular training.

    I have recommended HIIT for years in my Burn The Fat, Feed The Muscle program, using a 1:1 long interval approach, which, while only one of many ways to do HIIT, is probably my personal favorite method. However, I also recommend steady state cardio and even low intensity cardio like walking, when it is appropriate.

    My intentions for writing this article were four-fold:

    1. To encourage you to question where claims come from, especially if they sound too good to be true. 2. To alert you to how advertisers might use research such as this to exaggerate with statistics. 3. To encourage the fitness community to swing the pendulum back to center a bit, by not over-selling the benefits of HIIT beyond what can be supported by the scientific research. 4. To encourage the fitness community, that even as they praise HIIT, not to condemn lower and moderate intensity forms of cardio.

    As the original author of the 1994 HIIT study himself pointed out, HIIT is not for everyone, and cardio should be prescribed with progression. Also, mountains of other research has proven that walking (GASP! – low intensity cardio!) has always been one of the most successful exercise methods for overweight men and women.

    There is ample evidence which says that obesity may be the result of a very slight daily energy imbalance, which adds up over time. Therefore, even a small amount of casual exercise or activity, if done consistently, and not compensated for with increased food intake, could reverse the obesity trend. HIIT gets the job done fast, but that doesn’t mean low intensity cardio is useless or that you should abandon your walking program, if you have the time and if that is what you enjoy and if that is what’s working for you in your personal situation.

    The mechanisms and reasons why HIIT works so well are numerous. It goes way beyond more calories burned during the workout.

    Train hard and expect success,

    Tom Venuto, NSCA-CPT, CSCS Fat Loss Coach www.BurnTheFat.com

    Reference: Tremblay, Angelo, et al. Impact of exercise intensity on body fatness and skeletal muscle metabolism. Metabolism. Vol 43. no 7 (July). Pp 814-818. 1994..

    About the Author:

    Tom Venuto is a natural bodybuilder, certified personal trainer and freelance fitness Tom Venuto 8

    writer. Tom is the author of “Burn the Fat, Feed The

    Muscle,” which teaches you how to get lean without

    drugs or supplements using secrets of the world’s best

    bodybuilders and fitness models. Learn how to get rid of

    stubborn fat and increase your metabolism by visiting:

    www.BurnTheFat.com

  • The New Visualization Breakthrough: Mental Training Tactics For Health And Fitness Success

    The New Visualization Breakthrough: Mental Training Tactics For Health And Fitness Success

    Title: The New Visualization Breakthrough: Mental Training Tactics For Health And Fitness Success
    By line: By Tom Venuto, CSCS, NSCA-CPT
    URL: BurnTheFat.com
    Word count: 1500 words

    The New Visualization Breakthrough: Mental Training Tactics For Health And Fitness Success

    By Tom Venuto, NSCA-CPT, CSCS www.BurnTheFat.com

    Understanding the mind’s role in motivation and behavior is one of the most critical elements in fitness success. If you struggle with changing habits and behaviors or if you can’t get motivated, then even the best training and nutrition program is not much help.

    A fascinating fact about your subconscious mind is that it’s completely deductive in nature. In other words, it’s fully capable of working backwards from the end to the means. You don’t need to know how to reach a goal at the time you set the goal. If you “program” only the desired outcome successfully into your “mental computer,” then your subconscious will take over and help you find the information and means and carry out the actions necessary to reach it.

    Many people are familiar with affirmations and goal-setting as ways to give instructions to your subconscious mind. But perhaps the ultimate mental training” technique is visualization. In one respect, affirmation and visualization are the same, because when you speak or think an affirmation first, that triggers a mental image, being as the human brain “thinks” in pictures.

    You can use visualization to plant goals into your subconscious mind. You simply close your eyes, use your imagination and mentally create pictures and run movies of your desired results. For example, in your mind’s eye, you can see the “body of your dreams”. If repeated consistently with emotion, mental images are accepted by your subconscious as commands and this helps with changing habits, behavior and performance.

    Although there are some new and creative ways to use visualization, (which you are about to learn), this is not a new technique. Visualization has been used formally in the fields of sports psychology and personal development for decades and philosophers have discussed it for centuries:

    “If you want to reach your goal, you must ‘see the reaching’ in your own mind before you actually arrive at your goal.”

    – Zig Ziglar

    “The use of mental imagery is one of the strongest and most effective strategies for making something happen for you.”

    – Dr. Wayne Dyer

    “Creative visualization is the technique of using your imagination to create what you want in your life.”

    – Shakti Gawain

    “Perhaps the most effective method of bringing the subconscious into practical action is through the process of making mental pictures – using the imagination.”

    – Claude Bristol

    “There is a law in psychology that if you form a picture in your mind of what you would like to be, and you keep and hold that picture there long enough, you will soon become exactly as you have been thinking.”

    – William James, 1842-1910, Psychologist and Author

    Despite these glowing endorsements and a long track record, some people can’t get past feeling that this is just a “hokey” self-help technique. Rest assured, however, that visualization is an effective and time-tested method for increasing personal success that has been used by some of the highest achievers the world.

    The Soviets started to popularize visualization in sports psychology back in the 1970’s, as detailed in Charles Garfield’s landmark book, “Peak Performance.” They dominated in many sports during that period, which validated visualization anecdotally.

    In the last 10-15 years, there has been some groundbreaking new brain research which has validated visualization scientifically. Here’s something that was written recently by Dr. Richard Restak, a neuroscientist and author of 12 books about the human brain:

    “The process of imagining yourself going through the motions of a complex musical or athletic performance activates brain areas that improve your performance. Brain scans have placed such intuitions on a firm neurological basis. Positron emission tomography (PET) scans reveal that the mental rehearsal of an action activates the prefontal areas of the brain responsible for the formulation of the appropriate motor programs. In practical terms, this means you can benefit from the use of mental imagery.”

    So much for visualization being a “cheesy” self-help technique.

    Although visualization is widely used today, even people who are familiar with it often don’t realize its many applications. Arguably the most common use of visualization is by athletes, musicians and other performers as a form of “mental rehearsal.” Research shows that “practicing in your mind” is almost as effective as practicing physically, and that doing both is more effective than either one alone.

    A common use of visualization in the fitness context is “goal visualization.” In your mind’s eye, you can see yourself having already achieved your physique goal or your ideal goal weight. You can also visualize a specific performance goal such as completing a difficult workout or a heavy lift like a squat or bench press.

    One creative way you can use mental imagery is called “process visualization.” Once you’ve set your goals, it’s easy to come up with a list of the daily habits, behaviors and action steps necessary to reach your goal. So write down the action steps and visualize them – the entire process, not just the end result. See yourself food shopping and grabbing fruits, vegetables and lean proteins, ordering healthy foods from restaurant menus, saying no to sodas and drinking water instead, and going to the gym consistently and having killer workouts. Some people visualize their entire “perfect day” as they would want it to unfold. When you do this as vividly, emotionally and in as much detail as you can, you will be neurologically priming your brain to carry out those behaviors.

    The least known of all mental imagery techniques is called “physiology visualization.” An example would be picturing the fat burning process in your body or seeing the muscle fibers growing larger and larger. Using this technique, could it be possible that you might be giving subconscious instructions to your body’s cells, organs and tissues?

    Well, consider the work of Dr. Carl Simonton, a physician and cancer researcher who taught his patients (as one part of a comprehensive program), how to visualize powerful immune cells devouring the cancer cells. I’m not suggesting that you can cure cancer or materialize a lean and muscular body just by visualizing, (there’s a step in between thought and manifestation – it’s called action – a step that many self help ‘experts’ forget to mention). However, thoughts and mental images are the precursors to action and the fact that a mind-body connection definitely exists makes this an exciting prospect.

    Scientists have established the mind-body link in many contexts, and not just by the existence of a placebo effect. There’s also direct evidence as in the way emotional stress can contribute to physical disease. The mind does influence the body! The mere fact that a branch of science has been devoted to this area is proof that it deserves critical investigation and is not just the domain of infomercial self help gurus. The science is called psychoneuroimmunology.

    Using “physiology visualization,” you could, even in the middle of a workout, imagine the fat burning process taking place, and visualize fat being released from adipose tissue storage in your abdominal region or elsewhere. You could see the free fatty acids entering your bloodstream, being carried to the working muscles and being burned for energy in the muscle cells. You could also visualize the physiology of muscle growth.

    To make your imagery as accurate and detailed as possible, my best suggestion is to refer to an anatomy & physiology textbook that shows pictures of fat cells, blood vessels, myofibrils, motor units, sarcomeres, and cell organelles like the mitochondria, so you know what the structures look like. You could also get more details about the processes by looking up lipolysis, hypertrophy or beta oxidation.

    Even if you had no idea what the internal structure and workings of the body were like, you could still use this method. Your body responds to mental imagery even if it isn’t anatomically correct. We know from the field of hypnosis that the subconscious mind responds well to metaphor – maybe even better than literal suggestions. Facts and logic are the domain of the conscious mind, while emotion and metaphor can slip right past the conscious and into the subconscious. Dr. Simonton often wrote about his young patients who created (metaphorical) mental images of immune system cells as “knights in shining armor”, slaying “the dragon” of cancer cells.

    One of your greatest mental powers is imagination. You can visualize anything you want and you can embellish and exaggerate your imagery as much as you want. For example, you could imagine the free fatty acids being burned for energy in the “cellular powerhouse” – the mitochondria – and you could imagine the mitochondria as a fiery furnace… “incinerating” the fat! I think it’s a pretty cool idea to “see” your fat cells shrinking and visualize your body as a “fat burning furnace.”

    Should you not believe that there’s anything to the physiology visualization technique, that’s ok, because we know that the subconscious is deductive. Just give it a goal, tell it what you want and it will get you there automatically by altering your attention and behavior. Therefore, we can be confident that physiology visualization will be effective even if only as a subconscious directive about your desired goal. If science someday provides us with conclusive evidence that visualization actually does cause cellular – physiological changes in the body, well, that’s just all the better.

    About the Author:

    Tom Venuto is a natural bodybuilder, certified strength and conditioning specialistTom Venuto 8

    (CSCS) and a certified personal trainer (CPT). Tom is the

    author of “Burn the Fat, Feed The Muscle,” which teaches

    you how to get lean without drugs or supplements using

    methods of the world’s best bodybuilders and fitness

    models. Learn how to get rid of stubborn fat and increase

    your metabolism by visiting: www.BurnTheFat.com

  • 2 Cardio Mistakes You’re Still Making

    2 Cardio Mistakes You’re Still Making

    Title: 2 Cardio Mistakes You’re Still Making
    By line: By Tom Venuto, CSCS, NSCA-CPT
    URL: www.burnthefat.com
    Word count: 999 words

    2 Cardio Mistakes You’re Still Making

    By Tom Venuto, NSCA-CPT, CSCS www.BurnTheFat.com

    The controversies over cardio for fat loss are  endless: steady state versus intervals, fed versus fasted, long and easy versus  short and intense, and so on. Obviously there is a lot of interest in cardio  training and how to do it right. Sadly, most people are still doing 2 things  terribly wrong and it’s killing their results…… As best as I can figure, there  are two major reasons why people are still mucking up their cardio programs for  fat loss.

    REASON #1: NOT ENOUGH FOCUS ON TOTAL CALORIES BURNED

    Most people aren’t burning enough darn calories.

    Why? Well, I guess they are too busy worrying about the “proper” type of exercise (which machine or activity), the mode (steady state or intervals), the “optimal” ratio of intervals, or the “best” duration.Some people coast along on the treadmill at 2.3 miles per hour or some similar sloth-like pace and they think that just by hitting a TIME goal, such as 45 or 60 minutes, that with “X” duration completed, they are assured to get the results they want. On the other extreme, we have folks who have found or created some mega-intense, super-duper short training protocol like the “4-minute wonder workout from Japan.” Just because the workout is high in intensity and it is performed in intervals, they too think they are assured to get the results they want.

    What’s missing in both cases is the realization that total fat loss over time is a function of total calories burned over time (assuming you don’t blow your diet, of course).

    AND…

    Total calories burned is a product of INTENSITY times DURATION, not intensity OR duration.

    Too much focus on one variable at the exclusion of the other can lead to a less than optimal total calorie burn and disappointing results. And remember, intensity and duration are *variables* not absolutes! (“Variable” means you can change them… even if your “guru” says you can’t!)

    When you understand the relationship and interplay between INTENSITY X DURATION you will find a “SWEET SPOT” where the product of those variables produces the maximal calorie burn and maximum fat loss, based on your current health condition and your need for time efficiency.

    REASON #2: TOO MUCH FOCUS ON WHAT TYPE OF CALORIES BURNED

    As best as I can figure, there is one whopper of a mistake that is still KILLING most people’s cardio programs and that is…

    Way too much focus on WHAT you are burning during the workout – fats or carbohydrates – also known as “substrate utilization.”

    This idea comes from the notorious “fat burning zone” myth which actually tells people to exercise SLOWER and LESS intensely to burn more fat.

    Hold on a minute. Pop quiz. Which workout burns more calories?

    (A) A 30 minute leisurely stroll through the park

    (B) A 30 minute, sweat-pouring, heart-pounding, lung-burning run?

    Like, DUH!

    And yet we have trainers, authors and infomercial gurus STILL telling us we have to slow down if we want to burn more fat??? Bizarre.

    The reason people still buy it is because the “fat burning zone” myth sounds so plausible because of two little science facts:

    • The higher your intensity, the more carbs you burn during the workout
    • The lower your intensity, the more fat you burn during the workout

    And that’s the problem. You should be focusing on total calories and total fat burned during the workout and all day long, not just what type or percentage of fuel you are burning during the workout.

    It’s not that fat oxidation doesn’t matter, but what if you have a high percentage of fat oxidation but an extremely low number of calories burned?

    If you really want to be in the “fat burn zone,” you could sit on your couch all day long and that will keep you there quite nicely because “couch sitting” is a really low intensity (“fat-burning”) activity.

    (Of course, “couch sitting” only burns 37 calories per half hour…)

    HERE’S THE FAT-BURNING SOLUTION!

    In both cases, the solution to burning more fat is drop dead simple: Focus your attention on how you can burn more TOTAL calories during your workout and all day long. If you want to burn more fat, burn more calories and you can do that by manipulating ANY of the variables : intensity, duration and also frequency. If you build your training program around this concept, you will be on the right track almost every time.

    BUT WAIT – THERE IS MORE TO IT…

    Naturally, we could argue that it’s not quite this simple and that there are hundreds of other reasons why your cardio program might not be working… and I would agree, of course. But on the exercise side, the ideas above should be foremost in your mind.

    On the nutrition side, you have to get your act together there too.

    For example, many people increase their food intake at the same time as they start a cardio training program thereby putting back in every calorie they burned during the workout! Then some of them have the nerve to say, “SEE, cardio doesn’t work!”

    Incidentally, this is the exact reason that a few studies show that adding cardio or aerobic training to a diet “did not improve fat loss”: It’s not because the cardio didn’t work, it was because the researchers didn’t control for diet and the subjects ate more!!

    It should go without saying that nutrition is the foundation on which every fat loss program is built.

    Choose the combination of type, intensity, duration and frequency that suits your lifestyle and preferences the best, and WORK THE VARIABLES to get the fat loss results you want, but whichever cardio program you choose, remember that a solid fat burning nutrition program, such as Burn The Fat Feed The Muscle is necessary to help you make the most of it.

    Train hard and expect success,

    Tom Venuto Fat Loss Coach www.BurnTheFat.com

    About the Author:

    Tom Venuto is a natural bodybuilder, certified personal trainer and freelance fitness Tom Venuto 8

    writer. Tom is the author of “Burn the Fat, Feed The

    Muscle,” which teaches you how to get lean without

    drugs or supplements using secrets of the world’s best

    bodybuilders and fitness models. Learn how to get rid of

    stubborn fat and increase your metabolism by visiting:

    www.burnthefat.com

     

Dictionary
  • dictionary
  • diccionario
  • English Spanish Dictionary

Double click on any word on the page or type a word:

Powered by dictionarist.com